GI-Bill

New GI Bill housing checks flowing but some delays

By JUSTIN POPE (AP) GI_Bill

Facing a rush of last-minute claims, the Department of Veterans Affairs has cut housing checks to tens of thousands of veterans returning to college under the newly expanded GI Bill but officials acknowledge several thousand may get their money later than expected.

With the academic year recently under way, Tuesday was the first day many veterans were due their first monthly housing stipends, which range from under $1,000 to upward of $2,500 depending on factors including location.

Ryan Gallucci of the advocacy group AMVETS said Tuesday he was pleased with the effort, considering the complexity of calculating awards and administering the new benefit.

About two-thirds of the 67,000 remaining unprocessed claims were submitted only in the last 30 days. Claims are taking on average 28 days to be processed, and beneficiaries had been told to get them in at least a month ahead.

However, that still leaves about 20,000 unprocessed claims that are more than 30 days old. Veterans groups said they’ll continue to monitor the backlog and hold the department to its promise to be caught up by next month.

Keith Wilson, the department’s education service director, said much of the paperwork backlog may be from veterans simply filing to determine eligibility and not necessarily due housing checks. Any who are will get the full amount due by the Oct. 1 check period.

“That’s not to say that things are perfect now, and not to say we’re not being aggressive at trying to make it better,” Wilson said. “We’re going to continue to do yeoman’s work in making this better, but taking into account how far we’ve come we are pleased.”

Congress passed the Post 9/11 GI Bill last year, offering veterans the most significant expansion of educational benefits since the original GI Bill in 1944. The new benefits will exist alongside other continuing programs like the Montgomery GI Bill. Altogether, the VA expects nearly half a million veterans to participate in the coming year.

Overall, the department has received 236,000 claims related to the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has completed action on 169,000.

Getting the program up and running was a colossal bureaucratic undertaking. Claims under the new bill are more complicated than under the old, in part because the government is now essentially cutting three separate checks: one to colleges for tuition and fees, and two directly to veterans, one for housing and the other for textbooks and supplies.

Also, it’s a multistage process, with the department certifying eligibility but colleges also required to send in paperwork to certify enrollment.

The University of South Florida in Tampa, with about 1,000 veterans enrolled, is home to a new pilot program placing a VA counselor on campus to help students navigate the GI Bill and other benefits.

At a meeting there Monday with VA officials, Navy veteran Nate Dodge complained he’d applied online and waited six weeks. When he called to follow up, he was told his application had been lost because of the high volume coming in.

Dodge, who is looking to tap into new GI Bill benefits to continue his engineering studies, said he resubmitted his application at least three times, via fax and regular mail. He is still waiting to receive benefits.

“A lot of veterans are really counting on this money to make it through,” he said. VA officials at the meeting pledged to look into the matter.

Patrick Campbell, chief legislative counsel of the group Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said the department initially acted too slowly setting up the new system, but was doing its best to catch up.

“The problems were a year ago,” he said. “They’re doing what they can now.”

The delays some veterans will face underscore the need to simplify the new GI Bill before next year, he said, noting claims must be processed by hand and it can take up to two hours to determine benefits.

Associated Press Writer Christine Armario in Tampa, Fla. contributed to this report.

  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: http://www.gibill.va.gov/
  • Popularity: 9% [?]

    Student-veterans pinched by aid delay

    BY SHANE ERSLAND | The Daily IowanGI_Bill

    After five years of active duty in the Army and four days into his second year at the UI, Drew Mangler is unsure how he will pay his rent.

    Mangler, like roughly 60 other UI students, applied for financial aid for the new Post-9/11 GI Bill.

    But, to the veterans’ dismay, only three have been processed.

    “I worked all summer, so hopefully, that will cover [rent],” he said. “But I’ll probably have to get another job.”

    The new legislation, which was signed into law this month, includes more benefits than the Veterans Education Assistance Program, which student/veterans relied on in the past — and they can still use for assistance.

    Mangler said he needs the extra benefits the new bill provides, however, because it pays 100 percent of his tuition.

    “The way the original bill worked, we only had a flat rate of $40,000, which doesn’t cover four years of tuition at the UI,” he said.

    In addition, the new program includes a monthly living allowance and book stipend of $1,000 per year.

    But with classes underway, and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs telling school officials there will be a six- to eight-week delay, most students who signed up for the new bill don’t know when to expect their money.

    On Monday, the Veterans Affairs website showed 211,251 veteran applications for financial aid still pending. At this time last year, there were 43,522.

    Veterans began applying for the new bill on May 1, but the schools couldn’t send the requests to the veterans department until July 7.

    Herald “Skip” Kempnich, who handles all of the UI student veterans’ requests for financial aid, said the UI is in better shape than many schools because he sent in applications the first day he was allowed.

    “Some private schools who haven’t reported their tuition yet — who knows when [those vets] are going to get their money,” he said.

    Some schools wait to send in vets’ applications until they receive the students’ credit of eligibility — which shows how long a student was deployed — to check if the student qualifies for the Yellow Ribbon Program, Kempnich said.

    Under the program, Yellow Ribbon schools — which includes some private schools and graduate programs — must offer vets a scholarship for half of their tuition and fees. The veterans department matches the cost.

    But Kempnich doesn’t wait to check vets eligibility for the Yellow Ribbon. Instead, he sends in requests as early as possible, he said.

    “I made sure that [my veterans] at least get the minimum amount,” Kempnich said. “Then, if needed, I upgrade them to a Yellow Ribbon if they’re eligible.”

    Normally, if a UI bill is past due, the student can’t use his or her ID card for charging. But UI Cashier Marty Miller said the university will not penalize the vets this semester for an overdue bill in this case.

    “We’re trying to be as lenient as we can not to penalize students when it’s out of their control,” Miller said.

    Kempnich said regional processing centers for the veterans department are hiring hundreds of new employees to ease the crunch, but that has also created problems.

    “Some are overstaffing, and these new employees need more
    Fast Tube by Casper
    ,” Kempnich said.

    UI junior Jesse Boland, who also enrolled for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, said he will have to use money from his savings in the meantime

    But he isn’t exactly shocked about the delay.

    “I’ve been in the military for a while, so I’m not totally surprised by the backlog,” he said. “I expected it.”

    Popularity: 8% [?]

    Veterans start over as colleges ignore experience

    By ALAN SCHER ZAGIER (AP) – 2 days agostudent vets

     COLUMBIA, Mo. — Twelve years of military service left Donald Spradling highly trained in satellite imagery, nuclear engineering and foreign intelligence analysis. None of that made a difference to the University of Missouri.

    When the fall semester begins next week, the 33-year-old father of five will be taking largely introductory courses with the rest of the school’s freshmen.

    “I’m going to be studying things I already learned all over again,” the Navy veteran said.

    Nearly half a million veterans are expected on college campuses this year as part of the new GI Bill. The surge is leading to a call for schools to re-examine their policies of declining to grant college credit for military training and service.

    An estimated one in five colleges and universities do not give academic credit for military education, according to a recent survey of 723 schools by the American Council on Education that is believed to be the first systematic measure. Even more of the schools, 36 percent, said they don’t award credit for military occupational training.

    For Spradling and others, that can mean spending more on tuition, stretching financial aid or GI Bill scholarships and delaying their entry into the work force.

    “In most cases, it’s simply an academic decision that they’re not going to award any credit for learning acquired outside a traditional classroom,” said James Selbe, a former Marine and the council’s assistant vice president for lifelong learning.

    Missouri Chancellor Brady Deaton said the school considers most military preparation “experiential learning.” He noted that individual academic departments can choose to award credit on their own.

    “It may be very practical skills acquisition, but that may not be what university education sets out to do,” he said. “We’re looking to build on a framework, a foundation of knowledge.”

    At Boston College, a private school, the standard has always been to accept credit only for institutions of higher education, said school spokesman Jack Dunn.

    “That holds true for members of the armed forces as well,” he said.

    Many college-bound veterans said military recruiters often offer an unrealistic portrayal of what awaits in academia, suggesting their military coursework and training will count for college credit.

    Some advocates also fault a campus climate where military training is poorly understood. They say many schools underestimate the quality of their education, and unlike community college credit or Advanced Placement classes, it’s not easy to measure.

    “Because of their lack of knowledge of the military, they don’t equate it as the same as being in the classroom,” said Kathy Snead, president of Servicemembers Opportunities Colleges. The Washington-based group is a consortium of more than 1,800 schools whose members are required to recognize military coursework and training. Among the participants: the California State University system, George Washington, the State University of New York schools and Ohio State.

    Snead described one student at a Midwest research university who had worked as a Naval nuclear engineer but didn’t receive credit for his experience.

    “He had much more current knowledge than most of his professors,” she said. “He ended up helping teach the class.”

    Derek Blumke, a six-year Air Force veteran, helped found Student Veterans of America, a group that plans to push for a greater acceptance of military credit. At the University of Michigan, which he attends, some military coursework — such as foreign language study — is accepted for credit. Other work is not.

    “There needs to be a standard format set up,” said Blumke. “There are tens of thousands of vets coming home who aren’t receiving the credit they deserve because the proper protocol isn’t in place.”

    “It’s insulting,” he added. “They were teaching leadership in a way most colleges will never be able to.”

    Army veteran Michael McIntosh noted that Missouri’s policy meant he could not use his experience jumping from planes as part of an airborne unit to fulfill a physical education requirement — even as other students could enroll in scuba diving or similar pursuits.

    “I would have liked for them to at least acknowledge it,” he said. “It might have been a military education, but it was still a lot of work and a lot of training.”

    He now attends Columbia (Mo.) College, a liberal arts school with 18 satellite campuses on military bases — including Guantanamo Bay. The school accepts military training for credit, and some occupational training.

    And some colleges are even promoting their credits for military work as a way to recruit veterans.

    At Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, N.C., that led to more than 300 veterans enrolled in the fall semester, said Pat Brown, the school’s educational outreach dean. That’s more than six times the number enrolled just a few years ago.

    The school has established two degree programs geared specifically for service members: an emergency medical care degree for Special Forces medics and an emergency and disaster management degree for civil affairs personnel. Both accept military training and transfer military training for credit for other degrees.

    “People need to recognize that the quality of education going on in the military is at a very high level,” Brown said.

    Popularity: 11% [?]

    Obama Speaks to Veterans at VFW Convention

    Watch the Speech here. Transcript is also attached along with a live link to it. Obama phx

    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    For Immediate Release                                                       August 17, 2009

    REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
    AT THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS CONVENTION

    Phoenix Convention Center
    Phoenix, Arizona

    10:06 A.M. MST

    THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Please, be seated. Thank you so much. Commander Gardner, thank you for your introduction and for your lifetime of service. I was proud to welcome Glen and your executive director, Bob Wallace, to the Oval Office just before the 4th of July, and I look forwarding to working with your next commander, Tommy Tradewell.

    I want to also acknowledge Jean Gardner and Sharon Tradewell, as well as Dixie Hild and Jan Title and all the spouses and family of the Ladies Auxiliary. America honors your service as well.

    Also Governor Jan Brewer is here, of Arizona; and Mayor Phil Gordon, our host here in Phoenix. I want to acknowledge President — Dr. Joe Shirley, Jr., President of the Navajo Nation. And this wasn’t on my original card, but this is just an extraordinary story and you may have already heard from her, but I just want to publicly acknowledge and thank Ms. Helen Denton the secretary to Dwight Eisenhower — (applause) — who typed up the orders for the Normandy invasion and is here today, and what an extraordinary story that is. (Applause.)

    Members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, I am honored and humbled to stand before you as Commander-in-Chief of the finest military the world has ever known. (Applause.) And we’re joined by some of those who make it the finest force in world — from Luke Air Force Base, members of the 56th Fighter Wing. (Applause.)

    Whether you wear the uniform today, or wore it decades ago, you remind us of a fundamental truth. It’s not the powerful weapons that make our military the strongest in the world. It’s not the sophisticated systems that make us the most advanced. The true strength of our military lies in the spirit and skill of our men and women in uniform. And you know this. (Applause.)

    You know this because it’s the story of your lives. When fascism seemed unstoppable and our harbor was bombed, you battled across rocky Pacific islands and stormed the beaches of Europe, marching across a continent — my own grandfather and uncle among your ranks — liberating millions and turning enemies into allies.

    When communism cast its shadow across so much of the globe, you stood vigilant in a long Cold War — from an airlift in Berlin to the mountains of Korea to the jungles of Vietnam. When that Cold War ended and old hatreds emerged anew, you turned back aggression from Kuwait to Kosovo.

    And long after you took off the uniform, you’ve continued to serve: supporting our troops and their families when they go to war and welcoming them when they come home; working to give our veterans the care they deserve; and when America’s heroes are laid to rest, giving every one of them that final fitting tribute of a grateful nation. We can never say it enough: For your service in war and in peace, thank you VFW. Thank you. (Applause.)

    Today, the story of your service is carried on by a new generation — dedicated, courageous men and women who I have the privilege to lead and meet every day.

    They’re the young sailors, the midshipmen at the Naval Academy, who raised their right hand at graduation and committed themselves to a life of service. They’re the soldiers I met in Baghdad who have done their duty, year after year, on a second, third or fourth tour. They’re the Marines of Camp Lejeune, preparing to deploy and now serving in Afghanistan to protect Americans here at home. They’re the airmen, like those here today, who provide the close air support that saves the lives of our troops on the ground. They’re the wounded warriors — at Landstuhl and Walter Reed and Bethesda and across America — for whom the battle is not to fight, but simply to speak, to stand, to walk once more. They’re the families that my wife Michelle has met at bases across the country. The spouses back home doing the parenting of two, the children who wonder when mom and dad may be coming home; the parents who watch their sons and daughters go off to war; and the families who lay a loved one to rest — and the pain that lasts a lifetime.

    To all those who have served America — our forces, your families, our veterans — you have done your duty. You have fulfilled your responsibilities. And now a grateful nation must fulfill ours. And that is what I want to talk about today.

    First, we have a solemn responsibility to always lead our men and women in uniform wisely. And that starts with a vision of American leadership that recognizes that military power alone cannot be the first or only answer to the threats facing our nation.

    In recent years, our troops have succeeded in every mission America has given them, from toppling the Taliban to deposing a dictator in Iraq to battling brutal insurgencies. At the same time, forces trained for war have been called upon to perform a whole host of missions. Like mayors, they’ve run local governments and delivered water and electricity. Like aid workers, they’ve mentored farmers and built new schools. Like diplomats, they’ve negotiated agreements with tribal sheikhs and local leaders.

    But let us never forget we are a country of more than 300 million Americans. Less than 1 percent wears the uniform. And that 1 percent — our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — have borne the overwhelming burden of our security. In fact, perhaps never in American history have so few protected so many.

    So the responsibility for our security must not be theirs alone. That is why I have made it a priority to enlist all elements of our national power in defense of our national security — our diplomacy and development, our economic might and our moral example, because one of the best ways to lead our troops wisely is to prevent the conflicts that cost American blood and treasure tomorrow.

    As President, my greatest responsibility is the security and safety of the American people. As I’ve said before, that is the first thing I think about when I wake up in the morning, it’s the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. And I will not hesitate to use force to protect the American people or our vital interests. (Applause.)

    But as we protect America, our men and women in uniform must always be treated as what they are: America’s most precious resource. As Commander-in-Chief, I have a solemn responsibility for their safety. And there is nothing more sobering than signing a letter of condolence to the family of servicemen or women who have given their lives for our country.

    And that’s why I have made this pledge to our armed forces: I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary. And when I do, it will be based on good intelligence and guided by a sound strategy. I will give you a clear mission, defined goals, and the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That’s my commitment to you. (Applause.)

    Which brings me to our second responsibility to our armed forces — giving them the resources and equipment and strategies to meet their missions. We need to keep our military the best-trained, the best-led, the best-equipped fighting force in the world. And that’s why, even with our current economic challenges, my budget increases defense spending.

    We will ensure that we have the force structure to meet today’s missions. And that’s why we’ve increased the size of the Army and the Marine Corps two years ahead of schedule and have approved another temporary increase in the Army. And we’ve halted personnel reductions in the Navy and Air Force. And this will give our troops more time home between deployments, which means less stress on families and more training for the next mission. (Applause.) And it will help us put an end, once and for all, to stop-loss for those who’ve done their duty. (Applause.)

    We will equip our forces with the assets and technologies they need to fight and win. So my budget funds more of the Army helicopters, crews, and pilots urgently needed in Afghanistan; the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance that gives our troops the advantage; the special operations forces that can deploy on a moment’s notice; and for all those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, including our National Guard and Reserve, more of the protective gear and armored vehicles that save lives. (Applause.)

    As we fight in two wars, we will plan responsibly, budget honestly, and speak candidly about the costs and consequences of our actions. And that’s why I’ve made sure my budget includes the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    In Iraq, after more than six years, we took an important step forward in June. We transferred control of all cities and towns to Iraq’s security forces. The transition to full Iraqi responsibility for their own security is now underway. This progress is a testament to all those who have served in Iraq, both uniformed and civilian. And our nation owes these Americans — and all who have given their lives — a profound debt of gratitude. (Applause.)

    Now, as Iraqis take control of their destiny, they will be tested and targeted. Those who seek to sow sectarian division will attempt more senseless bombings and more killing of innocents. This we know.

    But as we move forward, the Iraqi people must know that the United States will keep its commitments. And the American people must know that we will move forward with our strategy. We will begin removing our combat brigades from Iraq later this year. We will remove all our combat brigades by the end of next August. And we will remove all our troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. And for America, the Iraq war will end.

    By moving forward in Iraq, we’re able to refocus on the war against al Qaeda and its extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That’s why I announced a new, comprehensive strategy in March — a strategy that recognizes that al Qaeda and its allies had moved their base from the remote, tribal areas — to the remote, tribal areas of Pakistan. This strategy acknowledges that military power alone will not win this war — that we also need diplomacy and development and good governance. And our new strategy has a clear mission and defined goals: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies.

    In the months since, we have begun to put this comprehensive strategy into action. And in recent weeks, we’ve seen our troops do their part. They’ve gone into new areas — taking the fight to the Taliban in villages and towns where residents have been terrorized for years. They’re adapting new tactics, knowing that it’s not enough to kill extremists and terrorists; we also need to protect the Afghan people and improve their daily lives. And today, our troops are helping to secure polling places for this week’s election so that Afghans can choose the future that they want.

    Now, these new efforts have not been without a price. The fighting has been fierce. More Americans have given their lives. And as always, the thoughts and prayers of every American are with those who make the ultimate sacrifice in our defense.

    As I said when I announced this strategy, there will be more difficult days ahead. The insurgency in Afghanistan didn’t just happen overnight and we won’t defeat it overnight. This will not be quick, nor easy. But we must never forget: This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is a — this is fundamental to the defense of our people.

    And going forward, we will constantly adapt to new tactics to stay ahead of the enemy and give our troops the tools and equipment they need to succeed. And at every step of the way, we will assess our efforts to defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies, and to help the Afghan and Pakistani people build the future that they seek.

    Now, even as we lead and equip our troops for the missions of today, we have a third responsibility to fulfill. We must prepare our forces for the missions of tomorrow.

    Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen adapt to new challenges every day. But as we know, much of our defense establishment has yet to fully adapt to the post-Cold War world, with doctrine and weapons better suited to fight the Soviets on the plains of Europe than insurgents in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan. Twenty years after the Cold War ended, this is simply not unacceptable. It’s irresponsible. Our troops, and our taxpayers, deserve better. (Applause.)

    And that’s why — that’s why our defense review is taking a top-to-bottom look at our priorities and posture, questioning conventional wisdom, rethinking old dogmas and challenging the status quo. We’re asking hard questions about the forces we need and the weapons we buy. And when we’re finished, we’ll have a new blueprint for the 21st-century military that we need. And in fact, we’re already on our way.

    We’re adopting new concepts — because the full spectrum of challenges demands a full range of military capabilities — both the conventional and the unconventional, the ability to defeat both an armored division and the lone suicide bomber; the intercontinental ballistic missile and the improvised explosive device; 18th-century-style piracy and 21st-century cyber threats. No matter the mission, we must maintain America’s military dominance.

    So even as we modernize our conventional forces, we’re investing in the capabilities that will reorient our force to the future — an Army that is more mobile and expeditionary and missile defenses that protect our troops in the field; a Navy that not only projects power across the oceans but operates nimbly in shallow, coastal waters; an Air Force that dominates the airspace with next-generation aircraft, both manned and unmanned; a Marine Corps that can move ashore more rapidly in more places.

    And across the force, we’re investing in new skills and specialties, because in the 21st century, military strength will be measured not only by the weapons our troops carry, but by the languages they speak and the cultures that they understand.

    But here’s the simple truth: We cannot build the 21st-century military we need, and maintain the fiscal responsibility that America demands, unless we fundamentally reform the way our defense establishment does business. It’s a simple fact. Every dollar wasted in our defense budget is a dollar we can’t spend to care for our troops or protect America or prepare for the future.

    You’ve heard the stories: the indefensible no-bid contracts that cost taxpayers billions and make contractors rich; the special interests and their exotic projects that are years behind schedule and billions over budget; the entrenched lobbyists pushing weapons that even our military says it doesn’t want. The impulse in Washington to protect jobs back home building things we don’t need has a cost that we can’t afford.

    This waste would be unacceptable at any time, but at a time when we’re fighting two wars and facing a serious deficit, it’s inexcusable. It’s an affront to the American people and to our troops. And it’s time for it to stop. And this is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. (Applause.)

    This is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue — it’s about giving our troops the support that they need. And that’s something that all Americans should be able to agree to. So I’m glad I have as a partner in this effort a great veteran, a great Arizonan, and a great American who has shown the courage to stand and fight this waste — Senator John McCain. (Applause.) And I’m also proud to have Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has served under eight Presidents of both parties, leading this fight at the Pentagon.

    So already I’ve put an end to unnecessary no-bid contracts. I’ve signed bipartisan legislation to reform defense procurement so weapons systems don’t spin out of control. And even as we increase spending on the equipment and weapons our troops do need, we’ve proposed cutting tens of billions of dollars in waste we don’t need.

    Think about it. Hundreds of millions of dollars for an alternate second engine for the Joint Strike Fighter — when one reliable engine will do just fine. Nearly $2 billion to buy more F-22 fighter jets — when we can move ahead with a fleet of newer, more affordable aircraft. Tens of billions of dollars to put an anti-missile laser on a fleet of vulnerable 747s.

    And billions of dollars for a new presidential helicopter. Now, maybe you’ve heard about this. Among its other capabilities, it would let me cook a meal while under nuclear attack. (Laughter.) Now, let me tell you something, if the United States of America is under nuclear attack, the last thing on my mind will be whipping up a snack. (Laughter and applause.)

    So this is pretty straightforward: Cut the waste. Save taxpayer dollars. Support the troops. That’s what we should be doing. (Applause.) The special interests, contractors, and entrenched lobbyists, they’re invested in the status quo. And they’re putting up a fight. But make no mistake, so are we. If a project doesn’t support our troops, if it does not make America safer, we will not fund it. If a system doesn’t perform, we will terminate it. (Applause.) And if Congress sends me a defense bill loaded with a bunch of pork, I will veto it. We will do right by our troops and taxpayers, and we will build the 21st century military that we need. (Applause.)

    Finally, we will fulfill our responsibility to those who serve by keeping our promises to our people. We will fulfill our responsibility to our forces and our families. That’s why we’re increasing military pay. That’s why we’re building better family housing and funding more childcare and counseling to help families cope with the stresses of war. And we’ve changed the rules so military spouses can better compete for federal jobs and pursue their careers.

    We will fulfill our responsibility to our wounded warriors. For those still in uniform, we’re investing billions of dollars for more treatment centers, more case managers and better medical care so our troops can recover and return where they want to be — with their units. (Applause.)

    But as the VFW well knows, for so many veterans the war rages on — the flashbacks that won’t go away, the loved ones who now seem like strangers, the heavy darkness of depression that has led to too many of our troops taking their own lives. Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury are the defining injuries of today’s wars. So caring for those affected by them is a defining purpose of my budget — billions of dollars more for treatment and mental health screenings to reach our troops on the frontier — on the frontlines and more mobile and rural clinics to reach veterans back home. We are not going to abandon these American heroes. We are going to do right by them. (Applause.)

    We will fulfill our responsibility to our veterans as they return to civilian life. I was proud to co-sponsor the Post-9/11 GI Bill as a senator. And thanks to VFW members across the country — and leaders like Arizona’s Harry Mitchell in Congress — it is now the law of the land. (Applause.) And as President, I’m committed to seeing that it is successfully implemented.

    For so many of you, like my grandfather, the original GI Bill changed your life — helping you to realize your dreams. But it also transformed America, helping to build the largest middle class in history. We’re saying the same thing to today’s post-9/11 veterans: You pick the school, we’ll help pick up the bill. (Applause.)

    And as these veterans show — start showing up on campuses, I’m proud that we’re making this opportunity available to all those who have sacrificed, including Reservists and National Guard members and spouses and children, including kids who’ve lost their mom or dad. (Applause.) In an era when so many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly, we choose to reward the responsibility and service of our forces and their families.

    Whether you’ve left the service in 2009 or 1949, we will fulfill our responsibility to deliver the benefits and care that you earned. And that’s why I’ve pledged to build nothing less than a 21st-century VA. And I picked a lifelong soldier and wounded warrior from Vietnam to lead this fight, General Ric Shinseki. (Applause.)

    We’re dramatically increasing funding for veterans health care. This includes hundreds of millions of dollars to serve veterans in rural areas, as well as the unique needs of our growing number of women veterans. We’re restoring access to VA health care for a half-million veterans who lost their eligibility in recent years — our Priority 8 veterans.

    And since there’s been so much misinformation out there about health insurance reform, let me say this: One thing that reform won’t change is veterans’ health care. No one is going to take away your benefits — that is the plain and simple truth. (Applause.) We’re expanding access to your health care, not reducing it. (Applause.)

    We’re also keeping our promise on concurrent receipt. My budget ensures that our severely disabled veterans will receive both their military retired pay and their VA disability benefits. (Applause.) And I look forward to signing legislation on advanced appropriations for the VA so the medical care you need is never held up by budget delays. (Applause.)

    I’ve also directed Secretary Shinseki to focus on a top priority — reducing homelessness among veterans. (Applause.) After serving their country, no veteran should be sleeping on the streets. (Applause.) No veteran. We should have zero tolerance for that.

    And we’re keeping our promise to fulfill another top priority at the VA — cutting the red tape and inefficiencies that cause backlogs and delays in the claims process. (Applause.) This spring, I directed the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs to create one unified lifetime electronic health record for the members of the armed forces — a single electronic record, with privacy guaranteed, that will stay with them forever. Because after fighting for America, you should not have to fight over paperwork to receive the benefits that you’ve earned. (Applause.)

    Today, I can announce that we’re taking another step. I’ve directed my Chief Performance Officer, my Chief Technology Officer and my Chief Information Officer to join with Secretary Shinseki in a new reform effort. We’re launching a new competition to capture the very best ideas of our VA employees who work with you every day.

    We’re going to challenge each of our 57 regional VA offices to come up with the best ways of doing business, of harnessing the best information technologies, of cutting red tape and breaking through the bureaucracy. And then we’re going to fund the best ideas and put them into action, all with a simple mission: cut those backlogs, slash those wait times, deliver your benefits sooner. (Applause.) I know you’ve heard this for years, but the leadership and resources we’re providing this time means that we’re going to be able to do it. That is our mission, and we are going to make it happen. (Applause.)

    Now, taken together, these investments represent a historic increase in our commitment to America’s veterans — a 15 percent increase over last year’s funding levels and the largest increase in the VA budget in more than 30 years. And over the next five years we’ll invest another $25 billion to make sure that our veterans are getting what they need.

    These are major investments, and these are difficult times. Fiscal discipline demands that we make hard decisions — sacrificing certain things we can’t afford. But let me be clear. America’s commitment to its veterans are not just lines on a budget. They are bonds that are sacred — a sacred trust we’re honor bound to uphold.

    These are commitments that we make to the patriots who serve — from the day they enlist to the day that they are laid to rest. Patriots like you. Patriots like a man named Jim Norene.

    His story is his own, but in it we see the larger story of all who serve. He’s a child of the Depression who grew up to join that greatest generation; a paratrooper in the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne; jumping in a daring daylight raid into Holland to liberate captive people; rushing to Bastogne at the Battle of the Bulge where his commanding general — surrounded by the Germans and asked to surrender — declared, famously, “Nuts.”

    For his bravery, Jim was awarded the Bronze Star. But like so many others, he rarely spoke of what he did or what he saw — reminding us that true love of country is not boisterous or loud but, rather, the “tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

    Jim returned home and built a life. He went to school on the GI Bill. He got married. He raised a family in his small Oregon farming town. And every Veterans Day, year after year, he visited schoolchildren to speak about the meaning of service. And he did it all as a proud member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. (Applause.)

    Then, this spring, Jim made a decision. He would return to Europe once more. Eighty-five years old, frail and gravely ill, he knew he might not make it back home. But like the paratrooper he always was, he was determined.

    So near Bastogne, he returned to the places he knew so well. At a Dutch town liberated by our GIs, schoolchildren lined the sidewalks and sang The Star-Spangled Banner. And in the quiet clearing of an American cemetery, he walked among those perfect lines of white crosses of fellow soldiers who had fallen long ago, their names forever etched in stone.

    And then, back where he had served 65 years before, Jim Norene passed away, at night, in his sleep, quietly, peacefully — the “tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

    The next day, I was privileged to join the commemoration at Normandy to mark the day when the beaches were stormed and a continent was freed. There were Presidents and prime ministers and veterans from the far corners of the earth. But long after the bands stopped playing and the crowds stopped cheering, it was the story of a departed VFW member that echoed in our hearts.

    Veterans of Foreign Wars, you have done your duty — to your fallen comrades, to your communities, to your country. You have always fulfilled your responsibilities to America. And so long as I am President of the United States, America will always fulfill its responsibilities to you.

    God bless you. God bless all our veterans. And God bless the United States of America. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

    END
    10:40 A.M. MST

    Popularity: 19% [?]

    New GI Bill changed for California

    Matthew B. Stannard, Chronicle Staff WriterGI_Bill

    Wednesday, August 5, 2009

    (08-04) 18:59 PDT – California veterans who attend private college or graduate school will receive tuition support from the Post 9/11 GI Bill, thanks to an agreement between the state and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    The agreement closed a wording loophole that had prevented such veterans from receiving tuition benefits.

    “Basically, what this is going to do is put California on the same footing as every other state,” said VA Education Service Director Keith Wilson.

    The news came as a relief to many California veterans, who had faced a choice between borrowing thousands of dollars or abandoning their chosen college.

    “This is very good news,” said Paul Miller, a former Marine studying at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music. “I was expecting to have to double my student debt this year because of this glitch. That’s 12, 13 grand in debt I’m not going to have to pay back. That’s huge.”

    California’s history of charging public university students “fees” and not “tuition” had created confusion under the new GI Bill, which took effect Monday and bases its reimbursement for private or graduate school tuition on each state’s undergraduate public school tuition.

    Because California technically did not charge public students “tuition,” the VA had originally concluded that nonpublic students could not receive any “tuition” reimbursement – even though most of the cost of private schools is called tuition, not fees.

    In response, the University of California last month relabeled the money it charged for instruction “tuition” instead of “fees,” which helped VA and California officials reach the agreement.

    “We’re all speaking the same language, basically,” said J.P. Tremblay, deputy secretary for California’s Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Under the new benefits, posted to the VA’s GI Bill Web site Tuesday afternoon, California veterans will be eligible for up to $287 in tuition per credit hour and $2,165 in fees per term, along with a book allowance and living expenses.

    Many veterans will be eligible for more under the Yellow Ribbon Program, under which private schools may put up more money toward veterans’ tuition, which the VA matches.

    Dozens of California schools are participating, but others are not because of the confusion surrounding the GI Bill in California.

    The deadline for joining the program has passed for this year, but enrollment will open in winter for next year’s program, Wilson said.

    The solution appears to render moot legislative fixes proposed by Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, and Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County), with support from most of California’s congressional delegation.

    “The men and women who made enormous sacrifices to serve our country deserve every opportunity to get a good education when they return home,” said Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee. “This common-sense change will help them do just that.”

    Also pushing for a fix had been Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, whose legislative director, Patrick Campbell, hailed the “extremely good news” but said the new GI Bill still needs tinkering.

    But for now, veterans such as Santa Clara’s Melanie Walker, a first lieutenant in the Army Reserve who served two combat tours in Iraq, were feeling relief. Walker, who is planning at attend the University of Southern California, had been expecting to take out personal education loans and possibly return to active duty, where over time the loans could be forgiven.

    “Most young people come into the military for the educational benefits, which are awesome when they work the way they’re supposed to,” she said. “We all knew (the wording issue) was a silly thing, and we were confident it would eventually go away. It’s just nice that sometimes things, on paper at least, can be resolved quickly.”

    More information

    www.gibill.va.gov

    www.newgibill.org

    E-mail Matthew B. Stannard at mstannard@sfchronicle.com.

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/05/MN6M193TE9.DTL

    This article appeared on page A – 4 of the San Francisco Chronicle

    Popularity: 6% [?]

    GI Bill in Effect, Obama Marks Occasion with Speech to Vets

    Virginia Veterans Joshua Lawton and Justin Brown were in attendance.Obama_Bama GI-Bill Speech

    By Philip Rucker
    Washington Post Staff Writer

    President Obama visited the electoral battleground of Northern Virginia on Monday morning to mark the implementation of last year’s GI bill granting higher education benefits to veterans of Iraq, Afghanistan and other post-Sept. 11 conflicts.

    The legislation is the most extensive educational assistance program for veterans since the original landmark GI Bill, signed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1944, during World War II. Although the bill to extend access to college for recent veterans passed Congress in 2008 and was signed by President Bush, the Department of Veterans Affairs issued its first payments to colleges and universities on Aug. 1. The government expects to spend $78 billion over the next decade.

    Obama used the occasion to reaffirm his administration’s commitment to American service men and women.

    “We do this not just to meet our moral obligation to those who’ve sacrificed greatly on our behalf and on behalf of the country,” Obama said in a 12-minute address before some 350 veterans, advocates and other officials gathered at George Mason University in Fairfax County. “We do it because these men and women must now be prepared to lead our nation in the peaceful pursuit of economic leadership in the 21st century.”

    Obama said the bill gives veterans an opportunity to become part of the “backbone of a growing American middle class.”

    He praised the veterans’ service and pointedly contrasted it with other, less noble behavior. “We have lived through an age when many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly — when service often took a backseat to short-term profits; when hard choices were put aside for somebody else, for some other time. It’s a time when easy distractions became the norm, and the trivial has been taken too seriously,” he said.

    “The men and women who have served since 9/11 tell us a different story. While so many were reaching for the quick buck, they were heading out on patrol.”

    “We owe a debt to all who serve,” the president added. “And when we repay that debt to those bravest Americans among us, then we are investing in our future — not just their future, but also the future of our own country.”

    Obama, flanked by Vice President Biden, described the GI bill as: “You pick the school, we’ll help pick up the bill.” The law grants every U.S. veteran who served in active duty since Sept. 10, 2001, an opportunity to receive an in-state, undergraduate education at a public college or university at no cost. It also offers student veterans a monthly housing allowance, annual book allowance and covers fees for tutorial services and other educational programs.

    The administration estimates the bill will help some 250,000 American veterans attend colleges and universities by 2011, Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric K. Shinseki told the assembled.

    “History is about to repeat itself,” Shinseki said, suggesting the bill could be as far-reaching as the original GI bill. He told the veterans’ gathering that the bill signifies the nation’s “respect and appreciation for your service and your sacrifice.”

    Sen. Jim H. Webb (D-Va.), a decorated Marine veteran of the Vietnam War and a former Navy secretary who wore his son’s war boots during his campaign for Senate in 2006, introduced the new GI bill on his first day in the Senate. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), whose grandfather went to college with help from the first GI bill, was an early co-sponsor of the bill.

    Former senator John W. Warner (R-Va.), a veteran of World War II and the Korean War who went to college because of the 1944 GI Bill, credited Webb for passing the overhaul legislation.

    “We recognized that massive reorganization and updating had to be done to this legislation,” Warner said. “But it was never fully recognized until Jim Webb came on board. He rallied us.”

    Details of benefits provided under the bill, as described by the White House, follow:

    BACKGROUND ON THE POST-9/11 GI BILL

    Eligibility

    · Post-9/11 GI Bill is a new Department of Veterans Affairs Education benefit for individuals who served on active duty after 09/10/2001.

    · Specifically, the individual must have served for an aggregate period of at least 90 days after 9/10/2001, or serve at least 30 continuous days on active duty after 9/10/2001 and receive a discharge for disability.

    · Benefit payment rates range from 40% of the maximum benefit for an individual with at least 90 days but less than 6 months of aggregate service, up to 100% of the benefit for individuals with at least 36 months of aggregate service or 30 continuous days and a discharge due to a service connected disability.

    · In general, individuals will remain eligible for benefits for 15 years from the date of last discharge or release from a period of active duty of at least 90 continuous days.

    Benefit Payment

    · Instead of one monthly payment to the beneficiary each month, as is typical under existing education benefit programs, there will be three different payments made under the Post-9/11 GI Bill:

    1. Tuition and Fees (paid directly to the school)

    2. Monthly housing allowance (paid to the individual)

    3. Books and supplies stipend (paid to the individual)

    · Individuals may be eligible for payment of their actual tuition and fees up to the highest amount of established charges for full-time, undergraduate training at a public Institution of Higher Learning (IHL) in the State the student is attending.

    · The housing allowance is equivalent to Basic Allowance for Housing for an E-5 with dependents based on the zip code of the school where the student is enrolled. However, active duty service members, anyone training at ½ time or less, and those pursuing entirely distance learning are not eligible for the monthly housing allowance.

    · A books and supplies stipend of up to $1,000 per year can be paid, which is prorated based upon the student’s payment rate. Active duty members are not eligible for this payment.

    Transfer of Entitlement

    · On or after August 1, 2009, DoD may allow an individual to elect to transfer entitlement to one or more dependents if he/she:

    o Has served at least 6 years in the Armed Forces; and

    o Agrees to serve at least another 4 years in the Armed Forces

    · DoD determines eligibility for transferability and may, by regulation, impose additional eligibility requirements and limit the number of months transferable.

    Yellow Ribbon Program

    · Schools may voluntarily enter into an agreement with VA to pay established charges not covered under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

    · Under this agreement, VA will match each additional dollar provided by the school (up to 50 percent of the established charges not already covered under chapter 33).

    · This benefit is only available to individuals entitled to the 100 percent benefit rate.

    Popularity: 17% [?]

    With new GI Bill, a surge of veterans at colleges

    Christian Science MonitorStudent Vet

    More than 100,000 veterans have already been approved under the bill taking effect Saturday. Are campuses prepared?
    By Stacy Teicher Khadaroo | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
    With provisions not only for tuition, but books and living expenses as well, waves of veterans are expected to jump at the chance to earn undergraduate or advanced degrees as the new Post-9/11 GI Bill kicks in Saturday.

    Already, 112,000 have had their eligibility for benefits approved by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    “It represents the first time since the original GI Bill where affordability is very unlikely to be a barrier as they seek the college of their choice,” says Jim Selbe, who manages military programs for the American Council on Education (ACE), a higher education association in Washington.

    The new GI Bill will help veteran Don Gomez complete a bachelor’s degree in Middle Eastern studies at City College of New York. Since 2006, after serving in Iraq in the Army, he’s been using less-generous benefits under the previous system.

    “If this [new law] had not passed, I would be without benefits in October and I would have to find a way [to bridge the time] until I graduate [in May], so this is like a lifeline,” he says. Under the new bill, Mr. Gomez qualifies for 12 more months of tuition and living expenses.

    For colleges, the coming school year will test “whether or not they are prepared for this influx,” Mr. Selbe says. A first-of-its-kind national survey released this month by ACE and several partners revealed both strengths and weaknesses in campus efforts to assist service members.

    Of 723 colleges and universities that responded, 57 percent provide services specifically for military personnel and veterans. Among those, 79 percent have a policy for refunding tuition when someone is deployed. But only 22 percent have a way to expedite re-enrollment, a number that ACE officials hope will go up quickly.

    Another major issue for veterans is credit for military and occupational training. In the survey, 81 percent of schools that offer services for military students do grant such credit. But veterans have reported trouble navigating the process, and “the No. 1 source of disappointment” is to receive less credit than they believe they deserve, Selbe says.

    Clubs where vets can connect on campus are also important, but only 32 percent of the schools with special services have such groups. Just 40 percent provide training to help faculty understand how best to assist veterans.

    Awareness is growing on college campuses that “the vets are here to stay, and like any nontraditional student, they have … unique situations,” says John Mikelson, director of distance learning for Student Veterans of America, which has chapters at 184 campuses and five online institutions.

    As with any new legislation, there may be kinks to work out in its implementation, says the law’s principal champion, Sen. Jim Webb (D) of Virginia, but to him the important point is that “we’re going to be giving a lot of people … the same chance at a first-class future that the people from World War II had.”

    Popularity: 11% [?]

    New GI Bill sending veterans to school this fall

    By KIMBERLY HEFLING (AP) – 8 hours agoGI_Bill

    WASHINGTON — Spc. Marco Reininger started the year on the dusty streets of Afghanistan. He’ll end it on the campus of Columbia University with the government picking up a large chunk of the $100,000 tab for tuition.

    The Post-9/11 GI Bill rolls out on Saturday, just in time for the fall semester for veterans of the recent wars. Reminiscent of the GI education benefits signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt two weeks after D-Day in 1944, the measure is aimed at transforming the lives of a new generation of veterans.

    President Barack Obama on Monday will attend a rally at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., in celebration.

    In the next decade, $78 billion is expected to be paid out under the new GI Bill, which is the most comprehensive education benefit offered since World War II.

    Many veterans who served after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks are eligible for full tuition and fees for four years at a state university, a monthly housing stipend and up to $1,000 annually for books. Among those covered are members of the Guard and Reserve who spent three months or more activated for war service, giving them vastly improved benefits.

    If they opt to attend a private institution or graduate program, they’d get up to as much as if they attended a public school in the state. About 1,100 schools and colleges are offering additional scholarships for veterans that the VA is matching under a Yellow Ribbon program.

    Many veterans say they can’t help but be thankful.

    “It definitely makes it more valuable,” Reininger, 25, a member of the New York Army National Guard, said of his combat experience. “Without that deployment, I couldn’t be eligible for anything.”

    By 1947, nearly half of all college students in America were veterans. The program cost $14.5 billion, and more than half of the nation’s 15 million World War II veterans participated in some sort of educational program.

    One of them was Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., 85, the child of immigrants from hard-scrabble Paterson, N.J., who fought in Europe at age 18. The GI Bill paid for him to go to Columbia University.

    “In a way, I’m not even sure I would’ve gone to college,” Lautenberg said. “The horizon was so limited. I couldn’t think in terms of the future.”

    Lautenberg signed on early to the new GI Bill legislation, which was authored by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., 63, a Vietnam veteran whose Marine son fought in Iraq.

    Webb attended the U.S. Naval Academy before his war service and Georgetown University’s law school afterward. He said paying for education sends a signal about the value of military service and helps veterans with readjustment issues.

    “There’s a tremendous downstream effect on the emotional well-being on the people who have served if you treat them right,” he said.

    Webb said he’s had success convincing others in Congress of the need for the new GI Bill by showing that when inflation is considered, veterans from the current wars are receiving about 15 percent of what some World War II veterans had received.

    Aubrey Arcangel, 27, an Iraq veteran who attends City College of New York, recalls chatting with some of his Army buddies in Iraq worried about finding a job in the recession, and telling them about the new benefit.

    “They were worried about getting out and looking for a job, and I said, ‘Listen, this new GI Bill will do good for you,’” Arcangel said.

    The legislation didn’t pass without a fight. Some lawmakers complained about the cost, and the Pentagon expressed concerns that many troops would leave the military to attend college. A popular benefit was added that allowed members of the military to transfer the benefit to spouses or children.

    It’s anticipated that 485,000 veterans or their family members could participate in the first year. About 112,000 claims have been processed so far, and more than 1 million callers have flooded a VA call center this year with questions.

    There are concerns that universities and the VA could be overwhelmed, in part, because the benefit is complex. And, there are complaints that veterans attending private schools in states that kept their public tuition low face a major disparity in what they receive.

    Keith M. Wilson, education service director at the VA, said agency officials are working with Congress on solutions to potential problems, but the agency overall feels good about its ability to execute the program.

    “There’s certainly going to be things that will not go as expected. We would expect to be able to learn from those situations and correct them quickly and move on,” Wilson said.

    Veterans from the nonprofit Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, which aggressively lobbied for the bill, are back on Capitol Hill pushing for what they call a GI Bill fix. Among other things, it would seek to solve the disparity in tuition amounts covered and grant new benefits for vocational programs. It would also provide a living allowance for those who live too far from a university and take classes online.

    “The benefit is fantastic, it’s transformative, it’s historic, but we also have serious concerns about where it stands right now,” said Paul Rieckhoff, the group’s executive director and founder.

    Iraq veteran Isaac Pacheco, 27, from Union, Ky., a Marine in the Individual Ready Reserve who is publications editor at AMVETS, said he’s grateful for the thousands of dollars he’s receiving to help pay for a graduate program this fall at Georgetown University.

    “Veterans are a really valuable resource to the learning pool, to the marketplace of ideas, so they’re going to bring a lot of valuable experience to these universities,” Pacheco said.

    On the Net:
    Veterans Affairs Department site on new GI Bill: http://www.gibill.va.gov/
    Nonprofit Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America new GI Bill site: http://dev.newgibill.org/
    Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

    Popularity: 8% [?]

    House panel passes new GI Bill changes

    By Rick Maze – Staff writerGI Bill Press photo Military Times

    A federal student aid bill was amended Tuesday by a House committee to increase Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits for veterans in states that heavily subsidize tuition at public colleges, and to expand student loan forgiveness for National Guard and reserve members when they’re mobilized.

    The GI Bill change, sponsored by Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., comes less than two weeks before the new veterans education benefits program will launch, and is unlikely to become law in time to influence benefits payments, which are set to begin as early as Aug. 3.

    McKeon’s amendment, approved by the House Education and Labor Committee by voice vote, would help students attending institutions of higher learning in California, Massachusetts and other states where the tuition cap on benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill will be low because of how they are calculated.

    Caps for each state are based on the highest tuition and highest fees charged at the in-state tuition rate for undergraduate education for a four-year public college or university. The cap is then used to determine the maximum payment for people attending private schools, or who are attending public schools but are either paying nonresident tuition or attending graduate school.

    McKeon’s plan would create a special supplemental grant for veterans in states with low public-school tuition costs that would combine the cost of tuition and fees into a potentially larger single payment.

    For example, if the cap for a state was $100 in tuition and $500 in fees, but a student attended a private college where tuition was $800 and fees were $100, current law would provide a payment of just $200 — the $100 in fees plus the maximum of $100 for tuition. In this case, McKeon’s amendment would allow a payment of $600, the combination of the tuition and fee caps for that state.

    In California, McKeon’s plan would allow up to $13,000 a year in tuition and fees for someone attending private school, rather than the current $1,000 maximum.

    There is a way around the cap for some students attending colleges and universities taking part in the Yellow Ribbon Program, under which the Veterans Affairs Department will match, dollar-for-dollar, any reduction in tuition made by a school for a qualified student using the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

    McKeon called the problem he is trying to correct a “technical issue” that “has been poorly interpreted against the intent of Congress.” That points the blame at VA for how rates are calculated. But VA officials have said the fault — if there is one — lies with lawmakers who wrote the law governing GI Bill payments.

    The fate of the McKeon grant is tied to the fate of the bill to which it is attached, HR 3221, the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009, a measure that changes private lending for college loans to nonveterans. Because it could lead to the loss of up to 35,000 jobs for private lenders, the measure is controversial and no sure thing.

    Along with McKeon’s provision, the committee approved an amendment by Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., that requires forgiveness on student loans in cases where a Guard or reserve member is called to active duty while attending college.

    Davis said relief is needed because someone who mobilizes in the middle of a quarter or semester gets no credit for the course work they have done to that point and must retake the same courses when they return from military duties.

    People called to service “have enough to think about without also worrying about whether they will have to pay additional student loans on the courses they have not completed,” said Davis, chairwoman of the House Armed Services Committee’s military personnel panel.

    Her amendment, also passed by voice vote, would direct the federal government to assume responsibility for any loans incurred by students who are activated.

    Popularity: 22% [?]

    Colleges focus on veterans as GI Bill brings more in

    KRISTIN M. HALL THE ASSOCIATED PRESSGI Bill

    FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. — With a fattened GI Bill covering full tuition and more, the number of veterans attending college this fall is expected to jump 30 percent from last year to nearly half a million. That has left many universities looking for ways to ease the transition from combat to the classroom.

    Vets already in school have run into problems including campus bureaucracy, crowds that can trigger alarm instincts honed by war, and fellow students who don’t understand their battlefield experiences.

    In response, colleges across the country are offering veterans-only classes, adding counselors and streamlining the application and financial aid process.

    Under the new GI Bill expanded by Congress last year, the number of military veterans either starting or continuing their studies this fall is expected to top 460,000, up from 354,000 last autumn, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Many of them will encounter a classroom culture shock that can leave them agitated.

    Ask Colin Closs, a former Fort Campbell soldier studying at Cleveland State University in Ohio, what bothers him most about how veterans are treated on campus and he lists strange and sometimes rude questions people have asked.

    “Was it hot?”

    “Were you always in a tent?”

    “Did you ever kill anybody?” Closs benefited this past school year from a program at Cleveland State started in 2007 by chemistry professor John Schupp to form some freshman-level classes with all veterans. Schupp’s idea is to keep the military men and women together as a unit so they can support and motivate one another.

    The University of Arizona adopted his program last year, and schools in at least a dozen states are working on programs modeled on Cleveland State.

    Closs said that after leaving the military, he had trouble interacting with people who don’t understand his wartime experiences. But when he takes classes with other veterans, they can talk about problems they may have, whether its educational or personal.

    “It’s like the VFW hall without the alcohol,” Closs said.

    The University of West Florida in Pensacola, not far from Eglin Air Force Base, is adding counselors to help service members with post traumatic stress disorder or other emotional problems, but administrators recognize that veterans don’t want to be categorized as disabled.

    “They feel like they are ostracized, or there’s a stigma attached, so how we handle that is getting a lot of scrutiny,” said Marc Churchwell, the school’s military education program coordinator.

    Churchwell, who is retired from the Navy, said his own experience with the previous GI Bill made him want to make the process easier for others.

    “It was very frustrating for me to the point I was ready to quit,” Churchwell said. “My goal is for those people to come to me so they don’t have to deal with it.”

    The University of California at Los Angeles has short orientation sessions for veterans and is creating an Iraq and Afghanistan veterans readjustment group in the fall.

    Matthew Nichols, a psychologist who just joined UCLA’s counseling and psychological services after working for the VA, said he hopes that students will feel more comfortable asking for help on a college campus versus walking into a veterans hospital.

    “These are everyday concerns,” he said. “It’s much less about ‘there’s something wrong with me’ and more about ‘how can I study a little better?’” he said.

    Congress voted last year to dramatically expand the GI Bill. The old measure offered $1,321 a month to cover all college costs. Effective Aug. 1, the new bill will cover tuition and fees for any in-state public university, a housing allowance and $1,000 a year for books and supplies.

    Even though getting the old GI Bill was a recruiting point for the military for decades, many soldiers have had trouble going back to school, sometimes because they are older and often have families.

    Jason Davis, 28, enlisted in the Army only a couple of weeks after 9/11 after dropping out of high school and facing minimum-wage jobs. Davis deployed twice to Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division and then was stop-lossed, a military practice of holding troops beyond their enlistment dates. He spent another 18 months after that in the California National Guard.

    The former sergeant said he struggled to find a job to support his wife and baby boy after leaving the military in 2008, mainly because his combat infantry job didn’t translate into good work experience.

    “There was no direction and I had to figure out everything on my own,” he said. “I felt like I was left to swim alone.”

    He has been taking classes at a community college in Irvine, Calif., and tried to start up a student veterans group, but he found that many have barriers that keep them from getting involved on campus. “We’re all older, or we have families, obligations or jobs,” he said.

    With the extra benefits coming to him under the new GI Bill, Davis will be able to afford to study literary journalism at the University of California at Irvine next fall. “It’s something I’ve been wanting for a long time,” he said.

    Popularity: 4% [?]