OIF

SecNav: Sex assault programs lacking

By Philip Ewing – Military Times–female marines
An internal Navy Department investigation has found widespread problems with the Navy and Marine Corps’ programs on sexual assault prevention, top service leaders said Tuesday in Washington, where they began a two-day summit aimed at finding new ways to stop sex assaults in the naval services.

Almost three out of five sailors and Marines believe sexual assault is a problem in the force; far too few victims actually report they’ve been attacked; too few crimes are prosecuted; and unit-level training is inconsistent, said Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, whose speech opened the conference at the Washington Navy Yard.

Many sailors and Marines don’t know the difference between sexual harassment and sexual assault; many don’t know how to report either one if it takes place; and many are simply bored by the training that is supposed to help prevent attacks, Mabus said.

The details came from an ongoing Naval Inspector General study, Mabus said, due to be completed in October, which apparently depicts a Navy and Marine Corps in which sexual assault is a major unaddressed problem. Mabus called on Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead, Marine Commandant Gen. James Conway and leaders throughout the services to eliminate it altogether.

“The message must be the same at every level of the chain of command. It must be the same from me, through the CNO and CMC to our ship captains and battalion commanders; from them through their chiefs and staff NCOs down to every corporal and petty officer third class — who must themselves reiterate the point to every seaman apprentice and private on the front lines,” Mabus said. “Sexual assault is unacceptable. Let me repeat myself, there is no place in the Navy and Marine Corps for a sexual assault offender.”

Conway and Roughead both said they worried the services had become complacent about training sailors and Marines in preventing sexual violence and hadn’t considered the need to make it interesting and relevant for audiences at different levels.

“As soon as you start talking about ‘the annual training’ as ‘something that needs be done,’ I’d say you’re dealing with a high probability of failure,” Roughead said. “Because if you simply say, ‘We’re going do to annual training for everybody,’ being a bureaucratic organization, we will do just that: We will check the box and move on,” Roughead said.

That applies not only from the abstract position of Big Navy, but all the way down to the deckplates, he said.

“If a sailor, who I consider to be the most perceptive creature on the face of the Earth, sees something that’s just being done just to check a box, that’s exactly how they’re going to treat it, and it really needs to be much more thoughtful than that,” Roughead said.

The preliminary findings of the IG investigation prompted Mabus to create an office of sexual assault prevention within the Navy Department, which will be charged with developing new training and other measures to prevent sexual violence.

Specifically, the Navy and Marine Corps will likely adopt a “bystander intervention” program, in which sailors and Marines will be trained on the warning signs of potential sexual assaults and how to intervene to stop them.

Popularity: 58% [?]

The Pentagon’s Bionic Arm

CBS 60 Minutes: Pentagon Is Working To Develop A Life-Changing, High Tech Prosthetic Arm–bionic armWhen Americans are wounded in Afghanistan or Iraq, no expense is spared to save their lives. But once they’re home, if they have suffered an amputation of their arm, they usually end up wearing an artificial limb that hasn’t changed much since World War II.

In all the wonders of modern medicine, building a robotic arm with a fully functioning hand has not been remotely possible.


Watch CBS Videos Online

But as 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley first reported in April, that is starting to change. One remarkable leap in technology is called the DEKA arm and it’s just one of the breakthroughs in a $100 million Pentagon program called “Revolutionizing Prosthetics.”

Fred Downs has been wearing the standard prosthetic arm since 1968, after he stepped on a landmine in Vietnam.

“It’s a basic hook. And I can rotate the hook like this and lock it,” Downs told Pelley, demonstrating the limited movement ability of his prosthetic arm. “In those days they didn’t have a lot of sophistication about it. They fit you and say, ‘This is your arm, this is your leg.’ And it was the best technology in those days and you just had to make yourself learn how to use it and I did.”

Today, Downs is the head of prosthetics for the Veterans Health Administration. He told Pelley the technology used for his arm was developed during the World War II era.

“There’s a hook, something out of Peter Pan. And that’s just unacceptable,” Dr. Geoffrey Ling, an Army colonel and neurologist who’s leading the Revolutionizing Prosthetics program, told Pelley

Col. Ling is a physician with big dreams and little patience, especially when touring Walter Reed Army Medical Center and meeting the troops he’s working for. “We have a saying in the military, ‘Leave no one behind.’ And we are very serious about that. And that doesn’t mean just on the battlefield, but also back at home,” he said.

Ling told Pelley they’ve made great strides in artificial legs, but a good arm has never been within their grasp. “If you look at your hand, it’s an incredibly complex piece of machine. What nature provides us is extraordinary. The opposable thumb, the five finger independently moving, articulating fingers. It’s fantastic what this does.”

“And when you lose your hand you’ve lost something that makes you human,” Pelley remarked.

“You’re so right Scott. Because, think about what makes us separate from every other animal species. We have an opposable thumb. That is, in fact, what makes us human,” Ling said.

Ling is determined to give that humanity back. His project is run out of DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – the same group that oversaw the creation of night vision, stealth aircraft, and GPS.

Ling told Pelley it’s a very large scale project. “It is very much like a Manhattan Project at that scope. It is over $100 million investment now. It involves well over 300 scientists, that is engineers, neuroscientists, psychologists.”

One of the scientists Ling asked to join the team is Dean Kamen, a sort of rock star in the world of inventors. His creations include dozens of medical devices, and the Segway.

They are inventions which have made him a multimillionaire.

“When the folks from the Defense Department came to this office and said, ‘Here’s what we need,’ what did they tell you?” Pelley asked.

“We want these kids to have something put back on them that will essentially allow one of these kids to pick up a raisin or a grape off a table, know the difference without looking at it. That is an extraordinary goal,” Kamen explained.

“He basically said, ‘You’re crazy.’ That’s what he told us,” Ling remembered. “He said flat out, he and he himself, who’s a crazy guy himself, I mean he is very innovative thinking. He’s a brilliant man, totally brilliant man, but mad scientist.”

Kamen told Pelley he thought the Pentagon and DARPA were unbelievably optimistic in their expectations and that he told them that.

“He said to us, he said, ‘I can do my, you’re crazy. But, we’re willing to rise to this, rise to the challenge because it’s important,’” Ling remembered.

Kamen took 60 Minutes behind the scenes at DEKA, his company in New Hampshire, to show Pelley how inspiration becomes invention.

“Engineers design a part on a computer, he fires it up here on our network,” Kamen explained.

Read the rest of the story at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/04/10/60minutes/main4935509.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody

Popularity: 18% [?]

Combat vets having tough time in job market

By Rick Maze – Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Sep 12, 2009 16:16:34 EDT

The unemployment rate for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans is 21 percent higher than the rate for all Americans, a sign of trouble for newly separated or retired service members looking for work in a tight job market.

A Labor Department report shows an unemployment rate of 11.3 percent for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in July, up from 5.9 percent one year ago and well above the 9.7 percent overall U.S. unemployment rate — itself the highest in 26 years.

To put that in another perspective, the number of out-of-work but job-seeking Iraq and Afghanistan veterans is at 185,000 — just 9,000 fewer than the number of troops deployed to those two combat operations, said Justin Brown of Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Brown said he is unsure why the jobless rate has jumped for recent combat veterans, but he said separating service members may find it especially difficult to get work in a job market that has few openings and a lot of competition.

“A 22-year-old getting out of the service right now has networks of friends and family who are not employment networks,” Brown said. “The primary way they are finding jobs are those listed in the paper or on the Web, and those are the hardest jobs to get because that’s where there is the most competition.”

Discrimination against veterans does not appear to be an issue, Brown said.

“I have seen nothing or heard nothing that would indicate employers are unwilling to hire veterans,” he said.

The government can and should be doing more to help, Brown said, by strengthening transition classes for separating and retiring service members to give them better job-hunting skills and by ensuring veterans have a fighting chance to get new jobs created by federal tax dollars.

Because the stimulus package granted money directly to states, some rules for federally fundedunemployed vets projects that would have helped veterans do not apply, such as certain preferential hiring rules and requirements to ensure veterans employment services are notified of openings.

Brown noted that Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., tried without success to get veterans preferences added to the stimulus package.

Popularity: 15% [?]

Virginia’s Joint Leadership Council’s Recommendations Fall Flat for Young Veteran’s Priorities

Virginia’s Joint Leadership Council recently issued its annual recommendations. The Council VASEALmade up of only representatives from pre-Vietnam veterans, and one Marine Colonel that served in Iraq, clearly contrasts from the veteran platforms adopted by both 2009 gubernatorial candidates. The candidate’s platforms consider a host of issues specific to younger veterans which find little mention in the JLC’s recommendations.

In particular, the Virginia Veteran finds it interesting that there is not one recommendation in regards to education or employment. Clearly the hot-button issues for transitioning veterans. This is unacceptable and clearly does not represent the most important issues facing a large portion of veterans in the Commonwealth of Virginia: namely the veterans who are currently fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Also, while the committee requests property tax breaks for disabled veterans it makes no mention of our nation’s homeless veterans. When Virginia Veteran called the Department of Veterans Service it was noted that the previous year’s homeless recommendation was repealed because a study for homeless Virginia veterans is under way.

In speaking with the Department of Veterans Service it was noted that the Joint Leadership Council was to be a body for Veteran Service Organizations to provide annual recommendations to the governor. Since the majority of the Veteran Service Organizations are represented by previous generations of war veterans their issues predominate.

In as much, The Virginia Veteran, unequivocally, does not endorse the JLC’s recommendations in that they failed to take into account the needs, and priorities, of younger generations of war veterans.

The JLC’s recommendations do not lack merit, nor do any of their recommendations fail to affect younger veterans–they lack representation from younger generations of veterans. As a body created under the Commonwealth, this ought not to be the case and the Virginia Veteran strongly urges both gubernatorial candidates to assess the situation upon their election and be sure that all advisory committees give fair weight to all generations of war veterans.

In combining the 45 members of both the Joint Leadership Council and the Board of Veterans Service there are exactly two members who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan and only one that was enlisted.

*In fairness, the Department of Veterans Service has been very cordial and receptive to young veterans playing a larger role.

JLC’s 2010 Legislative Priorities

http://www.dvs.virginia.gov/jlc_2010_legislative_obj.htm

The following legislative objectives were adopted by the Joint Leadership Council of Veterans Service Organizations (the JLC) on August 12, 2009. These are the top legislative objectives of the 23 Veterans Service Organizations represented on the JLC.1. Support the Department of Veterans Services FY11-FY12 Biennial Budget, to include:

  • Continued Level Funding for the Virginia Wounded Warrior Program: Support a budget item in the Governor’s Budget that (a) appropriates necessary funds to continue the Virginia Wounded Warrior Program at current funding levels, and (b) expands the staff by one full-time position.
  • Continued Level Funding for the Automated Claims Processing System: Support a budget item in the Governor’s Budget that appropriates necessary funds to continue development of the Automated Claims Processing System for veterans disability claims.
  • Provide Funding to open and operate the Southwest Virginia Veterans Cemetery: Support a budget item in the Governor’s Budget to provide the funds required to open and operate the Southwest Virginia Veterans Cemetery.

2. Virginia War Memorial Operating Funds and FFE Funds: Support budget items in the Governor’s Budget for (a) one-time funding for furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FFE), and (b) increased on-going operational funding for the Paul and Phyllis Galanti Education Center.

3. Real Estate Tax Exemption for 100% Disabled Veterans: Support legislation to amend the Virginia Constitution to require local governments to grant real estate tax exemptions for 100% service-connected disabled veterans without regards to means testing. Identical legislation passed the 2009 General Assembly and must pass the 2010 General Assembly in the same form.

4. Burial Vaults for Virginia State Veterans Cemeteries: Support a budget item in the Governor’s Budget that appropriates funds so that burial vaults may be provided for resale at cost at Virginia state veterans cemeteries.

5. Special Veterans Courts: Support legislation that allows localities, at their discretion, to establish special veterans courts for remedial treatment of veterans and military personnel accused of misdemeanor crimes.

6. Military Family Relief Fund: Support administrative or legislative initiatives to provide a subtraction when calculating Virginia taxable income for individuals receiving a grant from the Military Family Relief Fund.

 
 

Members and Organizations of the JLC

Veteran Service Organization JLC Representative Alternate
Air Force Association Jeff Platte Harold Barton
American Ex-Prisoners of War George Coker  
American Legion Brett Reistad Dale Chapman
AMVETS Bruce Brown  
Association of the U. S. Army Don Kaiserman  
Disabled American Veterans Dave Martinez  
Fleet Reserve Association Abe Zino  
Korean War Veterans Association James Jones John Dozier
Legion of Valor of the U.S., Inc. Roger Dimsdale Rich Rinaldo
Marine Corps League Bruce Steeley John Bonnell
Military Order of the Purple Heart Pete Fairchild Thomas Gimble
Military Order of the World Wars Bill Townsley Earl Johnson
MOAA Wes Edwards John Clickener
NAUS Chip Ellis  
Navy Seabee Veterans of America Frank Driscoll  
Non-Commissioned Officers Association Matthew Dailey Richard Schneider
Paralyzed Veterans of America David Coffield  
Reserve Officers Association Carmen Gentile  
Roanoke Valley Veterans Council Nolan Jackson Dan Karnes
Veterans of Foreign Wars Dan Boyer  
Vietnam Veterans of America George Corbett Charles Montgomery
Virginia National Guard Association Mike Coleman John Velleca
Women Marines Association Jenny Holbert  
Chairman of the Board of Veterans Services Paul Galanti  
Chairman of the Veterans Services Foundation Dave Richardson  
Commissioner of Veterans Services Vince Burgess  

Popularity: 12% [?]

Virginia Veteran’s Justin Brown Addresses VFW’s Current Conflict Veterans

Justin Brown was in Phoenix for the VFW’s National Convention where he was given the Convention Speechopportunity to address VFW’s 2nd annual current conflict veterans forum. See the speech at the embedded youtube link below. Also, a transcript of the speech has been attached.

Good afternoon Comrades,

It is great honor to be given such an opportunity to speak to you all today on behalf of the VFW’s Current Conflict Workshop. My thanks and gratitude to Commander in Chief Gardner, Soon to be Commander in Chief Tradewell, Junior-Vice Commander Eubanks, Adjutant General Gunner Kent, my fellow Iraq and Afghanistan vets and everyone else—my sincerest appreciation.

 

During the civil war it was brought to the attention of President Abraham Lincoln that General Ulysses S. Grant was an excessive drinker. In fact, one of Lincoln’s closest advisors warned Lincoln that Grant was “most of the time more than half drunk, and much of the time idiotically drunk.”

However, Lincoln was at a shortage for successful generals and in spite of Grants imperfections; he recognized Grant’s value and simply replied “if I could find the brand of whiskey Grant uses, I will promptly send a barrel to every one of my generals.” Needless to say Lincoln understood the importance of branding.

There is no question among younger veterans that the VFW has an issue with branding and image. The stereotypes of old, war veterans talking about war stories in bars resonates with many of us, true for some and false for others. While the VFW may not present the exacting image we please or do exactly the programs we wish. One day, now as before, the torch will be passed, and with that transition will lay the responsibility, the power, and the burden of knowledge, that it is our challenge, our requirement, to ensure that torch is readily accepted by our next generation of war veterans.

Jimmy Van Zandt, Robert Handy, Thomas Crago, James Currieo, Rice Means, Cooper T. Holt. These men built and shaped a body for veterans from nothing but their blood, tears, and sweat. This body was transformed to represent all eras of war veterans and as such this body was to be represented by all eras of war veterans.

However, as current conflict veterans we know this is not the case. Any current conflict veteran in this room has a much better chance of running for Congress, Running for the Senate, or simply running away, than they do of having a shot at assuming National Leadership in the VFW in the next ten years. Some consider our leadership structure to be broken, to stifle innovation, and to encourage generational factions and kingmakers, all while bleeding the organization of many  future high quality leaders. There is little debate, few questions, and a lack of accountability or elected leaders. Our mission to help VFW survive is to assure that this is changed.

The hour is critical, and even as I speak, the opportunity for each of us to build the bridge between old generations and new is eroding.

Fellow Current Conflict Veterans, we will have done ourselves and our children’s generations a profound disservice if we forgo the legacy of this organization more than 100 years in the making. There is so much to be done and our task will not be easy. Our current generation finds it much easier to passively join internet groups. Comrades, I assure you this will not be sufficient. For the good of our order and the future good of our sons and daughters who will join the military. I ask, no, we ask, that you see the bigger picture. The VFW is not merely here for individuals, it is here for the collective. Make no mistake, we can talk about benefits and we can speculate about power—however, without the VFW, the new GI-Bill would never have been a reality. The GI-Bill was not passed in the halls of Congress; the GI-Bill was not passed by talking heads on air waves in New York. The GI-Bill was passed by vigorously persuading 535 Senators and Congressman from the VFW grassroots. This possibility became reality as the VFW and the veterans that came before us forged an invincible alliance..

Today, the importance of the VFW lies not only in canteens and posts but in our local grassroots community organizations. This is why the VFW is such a force to be reckoned with. Whether posts have canteens or brick and mortar is of little matter—what is most important is that the VFW is strong and organized in every community, in every city, and every state, in the United States.

For the current generations of VFW veterans in power, great injury can be done to your own generation and those that follow, if we do not make the tough decisions. How are we raising money, how are we spending money, what is our mission and how does it need to be redefined? How do we bring all generations to the table at every level both politically and as professionally? Current conflict veterans are not being retained because the VFW doesn’t look like them and is not presently being led by any of them. Clearly as our leadership has pointed out, as is will not stand, as is, is broken and continuing the status quo is absolutely unacceptable.

The future of both our country and the VFW lies in a fragile state. I have the greatest confidence that we can all come together as equals—women and men forged in the fires of war, from all different backgrounds and ethnicities, to make the changes necessary for a sustainable future. A body in which we once again come together as one, including representatives from all generations of war—respected as qualified by that measure alone—a body in which open discussion and frank debate lead the order, and in such a setting we may decide who shall lead us.

So, my fellow current conflict veterans, again I emphasize, the VFW is more representative of you with every additional member. However, let us never sell ourselves short of the bigger picture. That is—our organization designed for all eras of war veterans—not to serve yourselves—but to  serve our comrades that did not return home, our comrade in need, and our comrade’s families.

Comrades, we need you, the VFW needs you and we need the VFW. This is a call to action. We must be the change we seek. Indeed, as Patton once said, never tell people how to do something, tell them what is needed.

Comrades we need you to join, we need you to get your fellow servicemembers to join because our fight is never over when the guns are silenced but is just begun. So let’s get started and together we will craft the VFW of the future!

Popularity: 25% [?]

Veterans forsake studies of stress

Stigma impedes search for remediesVETSnightsilo

By Bryan Bender, Boston Globe Staff  |  August 24, 2009

WASHINGTON – Researchers testing ways to treat the psychological wounds of war among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are encountering a serious roadblock: a shortage of willing study participants.

A strong stigma in the military associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, is blamed for the reluctance of combat veterans to take part in a pair of treatment programs being evaluated by staff from the Veterans Administration in Boston at facilities in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, study directors said.

The VA and the Pentagon hope the studies will lead to a standard intervention when veterans and returning soldiers exhibit signs of post-battle stress, reducing domestic abuse and other violence. In one study, they are measuring the effectiveness of intensive couples counseling; in another, they are schooling veterans in anger management.

But since recruiting began at the beginning of the year, only 10 couples have signed up for the first study, far short of the 440 needed, according to officials. Out of 135 male veterans needed for the second study, mean while, only 13 have been accepted so far.

“The problem is that part of PTSD is not really wanting to talk about your PTSD – not wanting to talk about anything that might bring up traumatic memories,’’ said Dr. Casey Taft, a psychologist who is overseeing the work at the National Center for PTSD at the VA Medical Center in Boston.

Researchers are expanding their outreach, meeting with military and veterans groups several times a week, distributing fliers at VA hospitals across the region, and placing ads in military outlets. A new website, www.strengthathome.com, has also been launched to drum up more participation in the studies, which are supported by $3.5 million in grants.

The Pentagon is sponsoring the research into treatments for individual service members, and the Centers for Disease Control is backing the work with veterans and their spouses.

PTSD is an anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to threatening situations or physical harm. It generates emotional detachment and a propensity to be easily startled, often resulting in aggressive behavior and violence. The government estimates that at least one-third of all service members who have served in Iraq or Afghanistan suffer from some form of mental trauma after their tour of duty. Those who have served repeat tours have been found to be more prone to psychological problems.

The disorder was found to be a major contributor in as many as 11 murders in 2007 and 2008 allegedly committed by members of an Army unit that returned from its second tour in Iraq, according to a recent Army study of the brigade based at Fort Carson, Colo. Soldiers in the unit were also found to be involved in a rash of other crimes, including beatings, rapes, DUIs, drug abuse, domestic violence, shootings, stabbings, kidnappings, and suicides.

While the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs have made significant strides educating service members about stress disorders and encouraging active duty service members and veterans and their families to seek help from a variety of new counseling programs, officials say there remains stiff resistance in the ranks to acknowledging mental wounds from combat.

Such resistance is seen as a major impediment to tackling the traumatic stress problem.

In some of his most expansive comments on the subject, President Obama recently said he has instructed top veterans officials to focus on “making sure that we are doing the screening that’s necessary so that problems don’t fester, and eliminating the stigma that may have historically existed when somebody is showing symptoms of PTSD, particularly if they’re still in [Iraq or Afghanistan], or still on active duty.’’

One of the Boston-area studies is looking specifically at the effects of PTSD on families and ways to prevent psychological problems brought on by combat from escalating into domestic violence, Taft said. The 10-week program begins with sessions to educate couples about the ailment and how it can lead to confrontation.

Taft said a veteran with post-traumatic stress disorder tends to disconnect emotionally from his or her partner even as the spouse wants to return to the intimacy they enjoyed before deployment. Combined with the veteran’s ability to be easily irritated and inability to sleep, “that can really lead to problems,’’ he said.

Subsequent phases of the couples study introduce new combinations of techniques to manage conflict in the home better and improve communication skills.

The second study, a 12-week program, is designed only for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and focuses heavily on anger management.

Taft said his researchers have done a lot of work on therapies to help veterans overcome what he called a “heightened level of threat perception.’’

Due to the nature of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan – where an innocent-looking bystander can be a suicide bomber or enemy insurgent – service members must be constantly aware of their environment, scanning their surroundings for the smallest sign of a threat. That vigilance can be hard to turn off at home, sometimes leading to the false impression that a family member or other person wants to cause harm.

But getting veterans to agree to treatment is proving to be the toughest part, Taft said. And, he warned, “the more they avoid seeking help the worse their symptoms will get.’’

Bender can be reached at bender@globe.com.  

Popularity: 8% [?]

Obama Speaks to Veterans at VFW Convention

Watch the Speech here. Transcript is also attached along with a live link to it. Obama phx

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary
___________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                                                       August 17, 2009

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS CONVENTION

Phoenix Convention Center
Phoenix, Arizona

10:06 A.M. MST

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Please, be seated. Thank you so much. Commander Gardner, thank you for your introduction and for your lifetime of service. I was proud to welcome Glen and your executive director, Bob Wallace, to the Oval Office just before the 4th of July, and I look forwarding to working with your next commander, Tommy Tradewell.

I want to also acknowledge Jean Gardner and Sharon Tradewell, as well as Dixie Hild and Jan Title and all the spouses and family of the Ladies Auxiliary. America honors your service as well.

Also Governor Jan Brewer is here, of Arizona; and Mayor Phil Gordon, our host here in Phoenix. I want to acknowledge President — Dr. Joe Shirley, Jr., President of the Navajo Nation. And this wasn’t on my original card, but this is just an extraordinary story and you may have already heard from her, but I just want to publicly acknowledge and thank Ms. Helen Denton the secretary to Dwight Eisenhower — (applause) — who typed up the orders for the Normandy invasion and is here today, and what an extraordinary story that is. (Applause.)

Members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, I am honored and humbled to stand before you as Commander-in-Chief of the finest military the world has ever known. (Applause.) And we’re joined by some of those who make it the finest force in world — from Luke Air Force Base, members of the 56th Fighter Wing. (Applause.)

Whether you wear the uniform today, or wore it decades ago, you remind us of a fundamental truth. It’s not the powerful weapons that make our military the strongest in the world. It’s not the sophisticated systems that make us the most advanced. The true strength of our military lies in the spirit and skill of our men and women in uniform. And you know this. (Applause.)

You know this because it’s the story of your lives. When fascism seemed unstoppable and our harbor was bombed, you battled across rocky Pacific islands and stormed the beaches of Europe, marching across a continent — my own grandfather and uncle among your ranks — liberating millions and turning enemies into allies.

When communism cast its shadow across so much of the globe, you stood vigilant in a long Cold War — from an airlift in Berlin to the mountains of Korea to the jungles of Vietnam. When that Cold War ended and old hatreds emerged anew, you turned back aggression from Kuwait to Kosovo.

And long after you took off the uniform, you’ve continued to serve: supporting our troops and their families when they go to war and welcoming them when they come home; working to give our veterans the care they deserve; and when America’s heroes are laid to rest, giving every one of them that final fitting tribute of a grateful nation. We can never say it enough: For your service in war and in peace, thank you VFW. Thank you. (Applause.)

Today, the story of your service is carried on by a new generation — dedicated, courageous men and women who I have the privilege to lead and meet every day.

They’re the young sailors, the midshipmen at the Naval Academy, who raised their right hand at graduation and committed themselves to a life of service. They’re the soldiers I met in Baghdad who have done their duty, year after year, on a second, third or fourth tour. They’re the Marines of Camp Lejeune, preparing to deploy and now serving in Afghanistan to protect Americans here at home. They’re the airmen, like those here today, who provide the close air support that saves the lives of our troops on the ground. They’re the wounded warriors — at Landstuhl and Walter Reed and Bethesda and across America — for whom the battle is not to fight, but simply to speak, to stand, to walk once more. They’re the families that my wife Michelle has met at bases across the country. The spouses back home doing the parenting of two, the children who wonder when mom and dad may be coming home; the parents who watch their sons and daughters go off to war; and the families who lay a loved one to rest — and the pain that lasts a lifetime.

To all those who have served America — our forces, your families, our veterans — you have done your duty. You have fulfilled your responsibilities. And now a grateful nation must fulfill ours. And that is what I want to talk about today.

First, we have a solemn responsibility to always lead our men and women in uniform wisely. And that starts with a vision of American leadership that recognizes that military power alone cannot be the first or only answer to the threats facing our nation.

In recent years, our troops have succeeded in every mission America has given them, from toppling the Taliban to deposing a dictator in Iraq to battling brutal insurgencies. At the same time, forces trained for war have been called upon to perform a whole host of missions. Like mayors, they’ve run local governments and delivered water and electricity. Like aid workers, they’ve mentored farmers and built new schools. Like diplomats, they’ve negotiated agreements with tribal sheikhs and local leaders.

But let us never forget we are a country of more than 300 million Americans. Less than 1 percent wears the uniform. And that 1 percent — our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — have borne the overwhelming burden of our security. In fact, perhaps never in American history have so few protected so many.

So the responsibility for our security must not be theirs alone. That is why I have made it a priority to enlist all elements of our national power in defense of our national security — our diplomacy and development, our economic might and our moral example, because one of the best ways to lead our troops wisely is to prevent the conflicts that cost American blood and treasure tomorrow.

As President, my greatest responsibility is the security and safety of the American people. As I’ve said before, that is the first thing I think about when I wake up in the morning, it’s the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. And I will not hesitate to use force to protect the American people or our vital interests. (Applause.)

But as we protect America, our men and women in uniform must always be treated as what they are: America’s most precious resource. As Commander-in-Chief, I have a solemn responsibility for their safety. And there is nothing more sobering than signing a letter of condolence to the family of servicemen or women who have given their lives for our country.

And that’s why I have made this pledge to our armed forces: I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary. And when I do, it will be based on good intelligence and guided by a sound strategy. I will give you a clear mission, defined goals, and the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That’s my commitment to you. (Applause.)

Which brings me to our second responsibility to our armed forces — giving them the resources and equipment and strategies to meet their missions. We need to keep our military the best-trained, the best-led, the best-equipped fighting force in the world. And that’s why, even with our current economic challenges, my budget increases defense spending.

We will ensure that we have the force structure to meet today’s missions. And that’s why we’ve increased the size of the Army and the Marine Corps two years ahead of schedule and have approved another temporary increase in the Army. And we’ve halted personnel reductions in the Navy and Air Force. And this will give our troops more time home between deployments, which means less stress on families and more training for the next mission. (Applause.) And it will help us put an end, once and for all, to stop-loss for those who’ve done their duty. (Applause.)

We will equip our forces with the assets and technologies they need to fight and win. So my budget funds more of the Army helicopters, crews, and pilots urgently needed in Afghanistan; the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance that gives our troops the advantage; the special operations forces that can deploy on a moment’s notice; and for all those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, including our National Guard and Reserve, more of the protective gear and armored vehicles that save lives. (Applause.)

As we fight in two wars, we will plan responsibly, budget honestly, and speak candidly about the costs and consequences of our actions. And that’s why I’ve made sure my budget includes the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In Iraq, after more than six years, we took an important step forward in June. We transferred control of all cities and towns to Iraq’s security forces. The transition to full Iraqi responsibility for their own security is now underway. This progress is a testament to all those who have served in Iraq, both uniformed and civilian. And our nation owes these Americans — and all who have given their lives — a profound debt of gratitude. (Applause.)

Now, as Iraqis take control of their destiny, they will be tested and targeted. Those who seek to sow sectarian division will attempt more senseless bombings and more killing of innocents. This we know.

But as we move forward, the Iraqi people must know that the United States will keep its commitments. And the American people must know that we will move forward with our strategy. We will begin removing our combat brigades from Iraq later this year. We will remove all our combat brigades by the end of next August. And we will remove all our troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. And for America, the Iraq war will end.

By moving forward in Iraq, we’re able to refocus on the war against al Qaeda and its extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That’s why I announced a new, comprehensive strategy in March — a strategy that recognizes that al Qaeda and its allies had moved their base from the remote, tribal areas — to the remote, tribal areas of Pakistan. This strategy acknowledges that military power alone will not win this war — that we also need diplomacy and development and good governance. And our new strategy has a clear mission and defined goals: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies.

In the months since, we have begun to put this comprehensive strategy into action. And in recent weeks, we’ve seen our troops do their part. They’ve gone into new areas — taking the fight to the Taliban in villages and towns where residents have been terrorized for years. They’re adapting new tactics, knowing that it’s not enough to kill extremists and terrorists; we also need to protect the Afghan people and improve their daily lives. And today, our troops are helping to secure polling places for this week’s election so that Afghans can choose the future that they want.

Now, these new efforts have not been without a price. The fighting has been fierce. More Americans have given their lives. And as always, the thoughts and prayers of every American are with those who make the ultimate sacrifice in our defense.

As I said when I announced this strategy, there will be more difficult days ahead. The insurgency in Afghanistan didn’t just happen overnight and we won’t defeat it overnight. This will not be quick, nor easy. But we must never forget: This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is a — this is fundamental to the defense of our people.

And going forward, we will constantly adapt to new tactics to stay ahead of the enemy and give our troops the tools and equipment they need to succeed. And at every step of the way, we will assess our efforts to defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies, and to help the Afghan and Pakistani people build the future that they seek.

Now, even as we lead and equip our troops for the missions of today, we have a third responsibility to fulfill. We must prepare our forces for the missions of tomorrow.

Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen adapt to new challenges every day. But as we know, much of our defense establishment has yet to fully adapt to the post-Cold War world, with doctrine and weapons better suited to fight the Soviets on the plains of Europe than insurgents in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan. Twenty years after the Cold War ended, this is simply not unacceptable. It’s irresponsible. Our troops, and our taxpayers, deserve better. (Applause.)

And that’s why — that’s why our defense review is taking a top-to-bottom look at our priorities and posture, questioning conventional wisdom, rethinking old dogmas and challenging the status quo. We’re asking hard questions about the forces we need and the weapons we buy. And when we’re finished, we’ll have a new blueprint for the 21st-century military that we need. And in fact, we’re already on our way.

We’re adopting new concepts — because the full spectrum of challenges demands a full range of military capabilities — both the conventional and the unconventional, the ability to defeat both an armored division and the lone suicide bomber; the intercontinental ballistic missile and the improvised explosive device; 18th-century-style piracy and 21st-century cyber threats. No matter the mission, we must maintain America’s military dominance.

So even as we modernize our conventional forces, we’re investing in the capabilities that will reorient our force to the future — an Army that is more mobile and expeditionary and missile defenses that protect our troops in the field; a Navy that not only projects power across the oceans but operates nimbly in shallow, coastal waters; an Air Force that dominates the airspace with next-generation aircraft, both manned and unmanned; a Marine Corps that can move ashore more rapidly in more places.

And across the force, we’re investing in new skills and specialties, because in the 21st century, military strength will be measured not only by the weapons our troops carry, but by the languages they speak and the cultures that they understand.

But here’s the simple truth: We cannot build the 21st-century military we need, and maintain the fiscal responsibility that America demands, unless we fundamentally reform the way our defense establishment does business. It’s a simple fact. Every dollar wasted in our defense budget is a dollar we can’t spend to care for our troops or protect America or prepare for the future.

You’ve heard the stories: the indefensible no-bid contracts that cost taxpayers billions and make contractors rich; the special interests and their exotic projects that are years behind schedule and billions over budget; the entrenched lobbyists pushing weapons that even our military says it doesn’t want. The impulse in Washington to protect jobs back home building things we don’t need has a cost that we can’t afford.

This waste would be unacceptable at any time, but at a time when we’re fighting two wars and facing a serious deficit, it’s inexcusable. It’s an affront to the American people and to our troops. And it’s time for it to stop. And this is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. (Applause.)

This is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue — it’s about giving our troops the support that they need. And that’s something that all Americans should be able to agree to. So I’m glad I have as a partner in this effort a great veteran, a great Arizonan, and a great American who has shown the courage to stand and fight this waste — Senator John McCain. (Applause.) And I’m also proud to have Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has served under eight Presidents of both parties, leading this fight at the Pentagon.

So already I’ve put an end to unnecessary no-bid contracts. I’ve signed bipartisan legislation to reform defense procurement so weapons systems don’t spin out of control. And even as we increase spending on the equipment and weapons our troops do need, we’ve proposed cutting tens of billions of dollars in waste we don’t need.

Think about it. Hundreds of millions of dollars for an alternate second engine for the Joint Strike Fighter — when one reliable engine will do just fine. Nearly $2 billion to buy more F-22 fighter jets — when we can move ahead with a fleet of newer, more affordable aircraft. Tens of billions of dollars to put an anti-missile laser on a fleet of vulnerable 747s.

And billions of dollars for a new presidential helicopter. Now, maybe you’ve heard about this. Among its other capabilities, it would let me cook a meal while under nuclear attack. (Laughter.) Now, let me tell you something, if the United States of America is under nuclear attack, the last thing on my mind will be whipping up a snack. (Laughter and applause.)

So this is pretty straightforward: Cut the waste. Save taxpayer dollars. Support the troops. That’s what we should be doing. (Applause.) The special interests, contractors, and entrenched lobbyists, they’re invested in the status quo. And they’re putting up a fight. But make no mistake, so are we. If a project doesn’t support our troops, if it does not make America safer, we will not fund it. If a system doesn’t perform, we will terminate it. (Applause.) And if Congress sends me a defense bill loaded with a bunch of pork, I will veto it. We will do right by our troops and taxpayers, and we will build the 21st century military that we need. (Applause.)

Finally, we will fulfill our responsibility to those who serve by keeping our promises to our people. We will fulfill our responsibility to our forces and our families. That’s why we’re increasing military pay. That’s why we’re building better family housing and funding more childcare and counseling to help families cope with the stresses of war. And we’ve changed the rules so military spouses can better compete for federal jobs and pursue their careers.

We will fulfill our responsibility to our wounded warriors. For those still in uniform, we’re investing billions of dollars for more treatment centers, more case managers and better medical care so our troops can recover and return where they want to be — with their units. (Applause.)

But as the VFW well knows, for so many veterans the war rages on — the flashbacks that won’t go away, the loved ones who now seem like strangers, the heavy darkness of depression that has led to too many of our troops taking their own lives. Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury are the defining injuries of today’s wars. So caring for those affected by them is a defining purpose of my budget — billions of dollars more for treatment and mental health screenings to reach our troops on the frontier — on the frontlines and more mobile and rural clinics to reach veterans back home. We are not going to abandon these American heroes. We are going to do right by them. (Applause.)

We will fulfill our responsibility to our veterans as they return to civilian life. I was proud to co-sponsor the Post-9/11 GI Bill as a senator. And thanks to VFW members across the country — and leaders like Arizona’s Harry Mitchell in Congress — it is now the law of the land. (Applause.) And as President, I’m committed to seeing that it is successfully implemented.

For so many of you, like my grandfather, the original GI Bill changed your life — helping you to realize your dreams. But it also transformed America, helping to build the largest middle class in history. We’re saying the same thing to today’s post-9/11 veterans: You pick the school, we’ll help pick up the bill. (Applause.)

And as these veterans show — start showing up on campuses, I’m proud that we’re making this opportunity available to all those who have sacrificed, including Reservists and National Guard members and spouses and children, including kids who’ve lost their mom or dad. (Applause.) In an era when so many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly, we choose to reward the responsibility and service of our forces and their families.

Whether you’ve left the service in 2009 or 1949, we will fulfill our responsibility to deliver the benefits and care that you earned. And that’s why I’ve pledged to build nothing less than a 21st-century VA. And I picked a lifelong soldier and wounded warrior from Vietnam to lead this fight, General Ric Shinseki. (Applause.)

We’re dramatically increasing funding for veterans health care. This includes hundreds of millions of dollars to serve veterans in rural areas, as well as the unique needs of our growing number of women veterans. We’re restoring access to VA health care for a half-million veterans who lost their eligibility in recent years — our Priority 8 veterans.

And since there’s been so much misinformation out there about health insurance reform, let me say this: One thing that reform won’t change is veterans’ health care. No one is going to take away your benefits — that is the plain and simple truth. (Applause.) We’re expanding access to your health care, not reducing it. (Applause.)

We’re also keeping our promise on concurrent receipt. My budget ensures that our severely disabled veterans will receive both their military retired pay and their VA disability benefits. (Applause.) And I look forward to signing legislation on advanced appropriations for the VA so the medical care you need is never held up by budget delays. (Applause.)

I’ve also directed Secretary Shinseki to focus on a top priority — reducing homelessness among veterans. (Applause.) After serving their country, no veteran should be sleeping on the streets. (Applause.) No veteran. We should have zero tolerance for that.

And we’re keeping our promise to fulfill another top priority at the VA — cutting the red tape and inefficiencies that cause backlogs and delays in the claims process. (Applause.) This spring, I directed the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs to create one unified lifetime electronic health record for the members of the armed forces — a single electronic record, with privacy guaranteed, that will stay with them forever. Because after fighting for America, you should not have to fight over paperwork to receive the benefits that you’ve earned. (Applause.)

Today, I can announce that we’re taking another step. I’ve directed my Chief Performance Officer, my Chief Technology Officer and my Chief Information Officer to join with Secretary Shinseki in a new reform effort. We’re launching a new competition to capture the very best ideas of our VA employees who work with you every day.

We’re going to challenge each of our 57 regional VA offices to come up with the best ways of doing business, of harnessing the best information technologies, of cutting red tape and breaking through the bureaucracy. And then we’re going to fund the best ideas and put them into action, all with a simple mission: cut those backlogs, slash those wait times, deliver your benefits sooner. (Applause.) I know you’ve heard this for years, but the leadership and resources we’re providing this time means that we’re going to be able to do it. That is our mission, and we are going to make it happen. (Applause.)

Now, taken together, these investments represent a historic increase in our commitment to America’s veterans — a 15 percent increase over last year’s funding levels and the largest increase in the VA budget in more than 30 years. And over the next five years we’ll invest another $25 billion to make sure that our veterans are getting what they need.

These are major investments, and these are difficult times. Fiscal discipline demands that we make hard decisions — sacrificing certain things we can’t afford. But let me be clear. America’s commitment to its veterans are not just lines on a budget. They are bonds that are sacred — a sacred trust we’re honor bound to uphold.

These are commitments that we make to the patriots who serve — from the day they enlist to the day that they are laid to rest. Patriots like you. Patriots like a man named Jim Norene.

His story is his own, but in it we see the larger story of all who serve. He’s a child of the Depression who grew up to join that greatest generation; a paratrooper in the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne; jumping in a daring daylight raid into Holland to liberate captive people; rushing to Bastogne at the Battle of the Bulge where his commanding general — surrounded by the Germans and asked to surrender — declared, famously, “Nuts.”

For his bravery, Jim was awarded the Bronze Star. But like so many others, he rarely spoke of what he did or what he saw — reminding us that true love of country is not boisterous or loud but, rather, the “tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

Jim returned home and built a life. He went to school on the GI Bill. He got married. He raised a family in his small Oregon farming town. And every Veterans Day, year after year, he visited schoolchildren to speak about the meaning of service. And he did it all as a proud member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. (Applause.)

Then, this spring, Jim made a decision. He would return to Europe once more. Eighty-five years old, frail and gravely ill, he knew he might not make it back home. But like the paratrooper he always was, he was determined.

So near Bastogne, he returned to the places he knew so well. At a Dutch town liberated by our GIs, schoolchildren lined the sidewalks and sang The Star-Spangled Banner. And in the quiet clearing of an American cemetery, he walked among those perfect lines of white crosses of fellow soldiers who had fallen long ago, their names forever etched in stone.

And then, back where he had served 65 years before, Jim Norene passed away, at night, in his sleep, quietly, peacefully — the “tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

The next day, I was privileged to join the commemoration at Normandy to mark the day when the beaches were stormed and a continent was freed. There were Presidents and prime ministers and veterans from the far corners of the earth. But long after the bands stopped playing and the crowds stopped cheering, it was the story of a departed VFW member that echoed in our hearts.

Veterans of Foreign Wars, you have done your duty — to your fallen comrades, to your communities, to your country. You have always fulfilled your responsibilities to America. And so long as I am President of the United States, America will always fulfill its responsibilities to you.

God bless you. God bless all our veterans. And God bless the United States of America. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

END
10:40 A.M. MST

Popularity: 19% [?]

Mental Stress Training Is Planned for U.S. Soldiers

New York Times 18psych_600

PHILADELPHIA — The Army plans to require that all 1.1 million of its soldiers take intensive training in emotional resiliency, military officials say.

The training, the first of its kind in the military, is meant to improve performance in combat and head off the mental health problems, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicide, that plague about one-fifth of troops returning from Afghanistan and Iraq.

Active-duty soldiers, reservists and members of the National Guard will receive the training, which will also be available to their family members and to civilian employees.

The new program is to be introduced at two bases in October and phased in gradually throughout the service, starting in basic training. It is modeled on techniques that have been tested mainly in middle schools.

Usually taught in weekly 90-minute classes, the methods seek to defuse or expose common habits of thinking and flawed beliefs that can lead to anger and frustration — for example, the tendency to assume the worst. (“My wife didn’t answer the phone; she must be with someone else.”)

The Army wants to train 1,500 sergeants by next summer to teach the techniques.

In an interview, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the Army’s chief of staff, said the $117 million program was an effort to transform a military culture that has generally considered talk of emotions to be so much hand-holding, a sign of weakness.

“I’m still not sure that our culture is ready to accept this,” General Casey said. “That’s what I worry about most.”

In an open exchange at an early training session here last week, General Casey asked a group of sergeants what they thought of the new training. Did it seem too touchy-feely?

“I believe so, sir,” said one, standing to address the general. He said a formal class would be a hard sell to a young private “who all he wants to do is hang out with his buddies and drink beer.”

But others disagreed, saying the program was desperately needed. And in the interview, General Casey said the mental effects of repeated deployments — rising suicide rates in the Army, mild traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress — had convinced commanders “that we need a program that gives soldiers and their families better ways to cope.”

The general agreed to the interview after The New York Times learned of the program from Dr. Martin E. P. Seligman, chairman of the University of Pennsylvania Positive Psychology Center, who has been consulting with the Pentagon.

In recent studies, psychologists at Penn and elsewhere have found that the techniques can reduce mental distress in some children and teenagers. But outside experts cautioned that the Army program was more an experiment than a proven solution.

“It’s important to be clear that there’s no evidence that any program makes soldiers more resilient,” said George A. Bonanno, a psychologist at Columbia University. But he and others said the program could settle one of the most important questions in psychology: whether mental toughness can be taught in the classroom.

“These are skills that apply broadly, they’re things people use throughout life, and what we’ve done is adapt them for soldiers,” said Karen Reivich, a psychologist at Penn, who is helping the Army carry out the program.

At the training session, given at a hotel near the university, 48 sergeants in full fatigues and boots sat at desks, took notes, play-acted, and wisecracked as psychologists taught them about mental fitness. In one role-playing exercise, Sgt. First Class James Cole of Fort Riley, Kan., and a classmate acted out Sergeant Cole’s thinking in response to an order late in the day to have his exhausted men do one last difficult assignment.

“Why is he tasking us again for this job?” the classmate asked. “It’s not fair.”

“Well, maybe,” Sergeant Cole responded. “Or maybe he’s hitting us because he knows we’re more reliable.”

In another session, Dr. Reivich asked the sergeants to think of situations when such internal debates were useful.

One, a veteran of several deployments to Iraq, said he was out at dinner the night before when a customer at a nearby table said he and his friends were being obnoxious.

“At one time maybe I would have thrown the guy out the window and gone for the jugular,” the sergeant said. But guided by the new techniques, he fought the temptation and decided to buy the man a beer instead. “The guy came over and apologized,” he said.

The training is based in part on the ideas of Dr. Aaron Beck and the late Albert Ellis, who found that mentally disputing unexamined thoughts and assumptions often defuses them. It also draws on recent research suggesting that people can manage stress by thinking in terms of their psychological strengths.

“Psychology has given us this whole language of pathology, so that a soldier in tears after seeing someone killed thinks, ‘Something’s wrong with me; I have post-traumatic stress,’ ” or P.T.S.D., Dr. Seligman said. “The idea here is to give people a new vocabulary, to speak in terms of resilience. Most people who experience trauma don’t end up with P.T.S.D.; many experience post-traumatic growth.”

Many of the sergeants were at first leery of the techniques. “But I think maybe it becomes like muscle memory — with practice you start to use them automatically,” said Sgt. First Class Darlene Sanders of Fort Jackson, S.C.

To track the effects of the program, the Army will require troops at all levels, from new recruits to officers, to regularly fill out a 170-item questionnaire to evaluate their mental health, along with the strength of their social support, among other things.

The program is not intended to diagnose mental health problems. The results will be kept private, General Casey said.

The Army will track average scores in units to see whether the training has any impact on mental symptoms and performance, said Gen. Rhonda Cornum, the director of Comprehensive Soldier Fitness, who is overseeing the carrying out of the new resilience program. General Cornum said that the Army had contracted with researchers at the University of Michigan to determine whether the training was working, and added that corrections could be made along the way “if the program is not having the intended effect.”

This being the Army, the sergeants at the training session last week had questions about logistics. How would teachers be evaluated? How and when would Reserve and Guard units get the training?

Perhaps the biggest question — can an organization that has long suppressed talk of emotions now open up? — is unlikely to have an answer until next year at the earliest. But the Army’s leaders are determined to ask.

“For years, the military has been saying, ‘Oh, my God, a suicide, what do we do now?’ ” said Col. Darryl Williams, the program’s deputy director. “It was reactive. It’s time to change that.”

Popularity: 19% [?]

Audio care packages for service members with Google Voice

Sergeant Dale Sweetnam

Google’s Official Bloggoogle

It’s not easy to stay in touch with friends and family when you’re fighting in a country thousands of miles from home. I spent 13 months in Iraq as an Army journalist where I flew in Black Hawks over Balad and Baghdad working to generate news coverage about my fellow soldiers. The whole experience was physically and emotionally draining, but it was especially difficult when I called home at the end of the day and nobody was there to answer.

For servicemen and women who are constantly on the move, having a single number and an easy way to retrieve messages from loved ones can be invaluable. To help our service members communicate with their loved ones and show our support to those serving our country, Google is launching a new program. Starting today, any active U.S. service member with a .mil email address can sign up for a Google Voice account at www.google.com/militaryinvite and start using the free service within a day.

When you deploy, your life is put on hold. While you live and work in a different world, everyone else moves on with life back home. Your family and friends keep moving, and this sometimes means it’s just not possible for them to stay awake until 2 a.m. to receive a phone call. Calling Iraq or Afghanistan is seldom an option.

Google Voice provides a solution to some of these problems. Service members can set up an account before they deploy. Or if they’re already deployed, families can now set up an account for their service member. Loved ones can call to leave messages throughout the day, and then when that service member visits an Internet trailer, all the messages are right there. It’s like a care package in audio form.

I signed up for an account when I came to Google, and it’s already making communications much easier here in the States. I know when I return to combat, Google Voice will help make life a little more manageable.

Posted by U.S. Army SGT Dale Sweetnam, Army Fellow

Posted at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/

8/04/2009 04:00:00 AM (From time to time we invite guests to blog about initiatives of interest and are pleased to have Sergeant Dale Sweetnam join us here. SGT Sweetnam is working with Google’s communications team this year through the U.S. Army’s “Training with Industry” Program. -Ed.)

Popularity: 22% [?]

SUNY Upstate Offers ‘Virtual Iraq’ Treatment to Help Veterans Heal from Combat-Related Post Traumatic Stress

SYRACUSE, NY (07/30/2009)(readMedia)– Veterans who suffer from combat-related postSUNY_logo traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) now have the newest, research-validated method of treatment available to them through Upstate Medical University’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

The treatment—called Virtual Iraq—uses components of the popular video game, Full Spectrum Warrior, as a way for patients to deal with the fears and anxieties resulting from exposure to the horrors of war.

“Service members who suffer from combat-related PTSD experience recurrent trauma associated memories, flashbacks, accompanied by extreme anxiety,” said Robbi Saletsky, Ph.D., Upstate clinical associate professor and director of the Cognitive Behavior Program for Depression and Anxiety Disorders. “As a result, they tend to want to avoid this discomfort and any triggers that could elicit these memories.

 

“Unfortunately, attempts to reduce distress and painful memories, may result in substance abuse, numbing of emotions, social isolation, and depression. The effective treatment involves approaching their feared memories in a systematic and controlled manner,” she added.

Virtual Iraq immerses the patient in computer-simulated combat situations similar to those that initially caused their fear and anxiety. After repeated and prolonged exposure to the scenario, the patient can experience the feelings associated with the trauma, organize and process the memory, express their thoughts and feelings to the therapist and then begin to heal.

As an example, Saletsky notes that while walking down a city street, a simple backfire from a car may stir a patient’s memory of a comrade’s death by gunshot, causing the patient to become fearful, anxious, avoidant and unable to function normally in daily life.

“With prompts from the patient, the therapist can recreate the sights, sounds and smells associated with the trauma memory, the comrade’s death by gunfire” said Saletsky. “This allows the patient to better understand the source of the fear, talk about and experience, the trauma scene and ultimately reduce the intensity of the distress associated with the memory. This also enables the patient to be less avoidant and begin to cope better in his or her every day life.”

The Virtual Iraq system consists of two computers, each equipped with a 3D graphics card that allows the therapist to introduce several simulated scenarios of combat threats, such as roadside bombings and gun warfare, and display dozens of settings, such as soldiers in a Humvee as well as sights found in Iraq or Afghanistan, including people in a marketplace, a desert or a mosque.

The system also includes a device for olfactory stimulation, allowing the therapist to introduce odors associated with war, such as gunpowder, burning rubber, garbage and smoke; and a platform and seat that gives the patient the sensations of vibrations and jolts. One computer is operated by the therapist who can select variables from a menu to accurately tailor the presented material to closely resemble the feared scenario. The second computer allows the patient to move through the simulated scenarios through special headgear and a joystick (to maneuver through the environment).

A Virtual Iraq treatment session can run anywhere from 40 to 50 minutes. The number of sessions depends on the patient’s needs. The treatment is covered by most insurance. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating condition that can develop following a terrifying event. Often, people with PTSD have persistent frightening thoughts and memories of their ordeal and feel emotionally numb and disconnected. Other symptoms can include depression, anxiety, substance abuse, insomnia, agitation, and hyper-vigilance.

Virtual Reality Exposure has also proven effective for a number of specific phobias including fear of flying, fear of heights, fear of public speaking and fear of storms.

Contact the Virtual Reality Exposure Program for additional details at 315-464-3115.

Popularity: 7% [?]